You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2006/02/10 19:48:46 UTC
Fwd: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
Hey Alan,
I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in GERONIMO-1619
and GERONIMO-1618. You've got GERONIMO-1618 already.
Can you take these both and can you get them in asap so I can get new
javamail jars into Axis and their build working again?
-David
Begin forwarded message:
> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
> Date: February 10, 2006 10:10:34 AM PST
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Cc: Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
> Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>> Currently ant clean all-tests fails at test.saaj package test:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TestAttachment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>> start="<DCD809ADF0929061EEBD95D393FAA38E>";;boundary=----
>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364018621
> [...]
>>>>>> TestAttachmentSerialization
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>> start="<BB649A1F2EB5FA531EA2D7CDC8E1063F>";;boundary=----
>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364114325
>>
>
>> I've just opened Jira GERONIMO-1619 with the fix (fixes, actually,
>> as it required a chain of at least 6 things to be fixed to clear
>> up the problem). There's also another Jira (1618) I opened to fix
>> a build problem that will require resolution for this to be
>> completely operational.
>>
>> I'm able to cleanly run the tests up to some of the wsdl/interop
>> tests, which fail because of compile errors. The specific
>> identified tests appear to be working now.
>
> Excellent! I'll get right on GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618 and
> get new jars into Axis asap.
>
> -David
>
Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
> I'm in favor of keeping the 1.0 and 1.1 spec jars all separate until
> this can all be sorted out. Too many people are having trouble
> building the HEAD because of the deps on the 1.1 spec jars.
I'm not sure what you man... I changed the depends on console-
framework just now to use 2 depends instead of one, but they are
still the latest versions built from specs/trunk.
--jason
Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 2/12/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> I ran into this yesterday too :-(
>
> Does not look like the new spec build using m2 creates a jar for
> maven 1 with all of the dependencies. The geronimo-spec-j2ee module
> only builds a pom.
>
> Maybe, until we can move to m2, we should just depend on each of the
> spec jars and not the all-in-one j2ee version.
I'm in favor of keeping the 1.0 and 1.1 spec jars all separate until
this can all be sorted out. Too many people are having trouble
building the HEAD because of the deps on the 1.1 spec jars.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
Castor (http://castor.org/)
Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I ran into this yesterday too :-(
Does not look like the new spec build using m2 creates a jar for
maven 1 with all of the dependencies. The geronimo-spec-j2ee module
only builds a pom.
Maybe, until we can move to m2, we should just depend on each of the
spec jars and not the all-in-one j2ee version.
--jason
On Feb 12, 2006, at 2:44 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> 2006/2/12, David Blevins <da...@visi.com>:
>
>> As well, I deleted the old 1.1-SNAPSHOT jars that never should
> ...snip...
>> geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> ...and (incidentally) broke [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geronimo::
> Applications:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> File...... /home/continuum/.maven/cache/maven-multiproject-
> plugin-1.4.1/plugin.jelly
> Element... maven:reactor
> Line...... 218
> Column.... -1
> The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied
> dependency:
>
> geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
> ;)
>
>> -David
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Re: old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <el...@gmail.com>.
2006/2/12, David Blevins <da...@visi.com>:
> As well, I deleted the old 1.1-SNAPSHOT jars that never should
...snip...
> geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
...and (incidentally) broke [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Geronimo:: Applications:
BUILD FAILED
File...... /home/continuum/.maven/cache/maven-multiproject-plugin-1.4.1/plugin.jelly
Element... maven:reactor
Line...... 218
Column.... -1
The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependency:
geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
;)
> -David
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
old specs (was: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Feb 10, 2006, at 5:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> One note, we are publishing the 1.0 jars with the snapshot jars
> which we probably should not do. It means there is one jar here,
> for example:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/repository/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
> geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
>
> ...which is different than these jars...
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/
> org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
> http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
> geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
> http://www.tux.org/pub/net/apache/dist/java-repository/
> org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
> http://apache.mirror99.com/java-repository/
> org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
>
> You might want to kill those quick before someone grabs them.
> Maybe just copy all the *1.0.jar files from /www/www.apache.org/...
> into /www/cvs.apache.org/...
>
So, I rsync'ed the correct spec 1.0 jars into cvs.apache.org
rsync -rt -v /www/www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs /www/cvs.apache.org/repository/
As well, I deleted the old 1.1-SNAPSHOT jars that never should have been
geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-ejb_2.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-j2ee-deployment_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-j2ee_1.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-jsp_2.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-jsp_2.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-jsp_2.0_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-jta_1.0.1B_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-qname_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-saaj_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-saaj_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-saaj_1.1_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.md5
geronimo-servlet_2.4_spec-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.sha1
-David
Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Excellent.
One note, we are publishing the 1.0 jars with the snapshot jars which
we probably should not do. It means there is one jar here, for example:
http://cvs.apache.org/repository/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
...which is different than these jars...
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
http://www.tux.org/pub/net/apache/dist/java-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
http://apache.mirror99.com/java-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
You might want to kill those quick before someone grabs them. Maybe
just copy all the *1.0.jar files from /www/www.apache.org/... into /
www/cvs.apache.org/...
-David
On Feb 10, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Uploaded
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On 2/10/2006 12:12 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Yes Sir, Thank You Sir!
>>
>> Let me know when they're up and I'll check those puppies into Axis
>> scm.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>
>>> Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On 2/10/2006 10:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Alan,
>>>>
>>>> I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
>>>> activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in
>>>> GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618. You've got GERONIMO-1618
>>>> already.
>>>>
>>>> Can you take these both and can you get them in asap so I can
>>>> get new javamail jars into Axis and their build working again?
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>>>> Date: February 10, 2006 10:10:34 AM PST
>>>>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>>> Cc: Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
>>>>> Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Currently ant clean all-tests fails at test.saaj package
>>>>>>>>>> test:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TestAttachment
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>>>> start="<DCD809ADF0929061EEBD95D393FAA38E>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364018621
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TestAttachmentSerialization
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>>>> start="<BB649A1F2EB5FA531EA2D7CDC8E1063F>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364114325
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've just opened Jira GERONIMO-1619 with the fix (fixes,
>>>>>> actually, as it required a chain of at least 6 things to be
>>>>>> fixed to clear up the problem). There's also another Jira
>>>>>> (1618) I opened to fix a build problem that will require
>>>>>> resolution for this to be completely operational.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm able to cleanly run the tests up to some of the wsdl/
>>>>>> interop tests, which fail because of compile errors. The
>>>>>> specific identified tests appear to be working now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent! I'll get right on GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618
>>>>> and get new jars into Axis asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
Uploaded
Regards,
Alan
On 2/10/2006 12:12 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Yes Sir, Thank You Sir!
>
> Let me know when they're up and I'll check those puppies into Axis scm.
>
> -David
>
> On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On 2/10/2006 10:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Alan,
>>>
>>> I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
>>> activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in GERONIMO-1619
>>> and GERONIMO-1618. You've got GERONIMO-1618 already.
>>>
>>> Can you take these both and can you get them in asap so I can get
>>> new javamail jars into Axis and their build working again?
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>>> Date: February 10, 2006 10:10:34 AM PST
>>>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>> Cc: Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
>>>> Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Currently ant clean all-tests fails at test.saaj package test:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TestAttachment
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>>> start="<DCD809ADF0929061EEBD95D393FAA38E>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364018621
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> TestAttachmentSerialization
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>>> start="<BB649A1F2EB5FA531EA2D7CDC8E1063F>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364114325
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've just opened Jira GERONIMO-1619 with the fix (fixes,
>>>>> actually, as it required a chain of at least 6 things to be
>>>>> fixed to clear up the problem). There's also another Jira
>>>>> (1618) I opened to fix a build problem that will require
>>>>> resolution for this to be completely operational.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm able to cleanly run the tests up to some of the wsdl/ interop
>>>>> tests, which fail because of compile errors. The specific
>>>>> identified tests appear to be working now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Excellent! I'll get right on GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618 and
>>>> get new jars into Axis asap.
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Yes Sir, Thank You Sir!
Let me know when they're up and I'll check those puppies into Axis scm.
-David
On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On 2/10/2006 10:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Hey Alan,
>>
>> I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
>> activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in
>> GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618. You've got GERONIMO-1618 already.
>>
>> Can you take these both and can you get them in asap so I can get
>> new javamail jars into Axis and their build working again?
>>
>> -David
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>>> Date: February 10, 2006 10:10:34 AM PST
>>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>> Cc: Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
>>> Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Currently ant clean all-tests fails at test.saaj package test:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TestAttachment
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>> start="<DCD809ADF0929061EEBD95D393FAA38E>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364018621
>>>>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>>> TestAttachmentSerialization
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>>> start="<BB649A1F2EB5FA531EA2D7CDC8E1063F>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364114325
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> I've just opened Jira GERONIMO-1619 with the fix (fixes,
>>>> actually, as it required a chain of at least 6 things to be
>>>> fixed to clear up the problem). There's also another Jira
>>>> (1618) I opened to fix a build problem that will require
>>>> resolution for this to be completely operational.
>>>>
>>>> I'm able to cleanly run the tests up to some of the wsdl/
>>>> interop tests, which fail because of compile errors. The
>>>> specific identified tests appear to be working now.
>>>
>>>
>>> Excellent! I'll get right on GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618
>>> and get new jars into Axis asap.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>
>
Re: Fwd: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies?
Regards,
Alan
On 2/10/2006 10:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Hey Alan,
>
> I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
> activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in GERONIMO-1619
> and GERONIMO-1618. You've got GERONIMO-1618 already.
>
> Can you take these both and can you get them in asap so I can get new
> javamail jars into Axis and their build working again?
>
> -David
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: David Blevins <da...@visi.com>
>> Date: February 10, 2006 10:10:34 AM PST
>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>> Cc: Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Axis 1.X HEAD broken
>> Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> David Blevins wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Currently ant clean all-tests fails at test.saaj package test:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TestAttachment
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>> start="<DCD809ADF0929061EEBD95D393FAA38E>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364018621
>>>>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>>> TestAttachmentSerialization
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - java.io.IOException:
>>>>>>> javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: multipart/
>>>>>>> related; type="text/xml";
>>>>>>> start="<BB649A1F2EB5FA531EA2D7CDC8E1063F>";;boundary=----
>>>>>>> =_Part_0.1139364114325
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>> I've just opened Jira GERONIMO-1619 with the fix (fixes, actually,
>>> as it required a chain of at least 6 things to be fixed to clear up
>>> the problem). There's also another Jira (1618) I opened to fix a
>>> build problem that will require resolution for this to be
>>> completely operational.
>>>
>>> I'm able to cleanly run the tests up to some of the wsdl/interop
>>> tests, which fail because of compile errors. The specific
>>> identified tests appear to be working now.
>>
>>
>> Excellent! I'll get right on GERONIMO-1619 and GERONIMO-1618 and
>> get new jars into Axis asap.
>>
>> -David
>>