You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2018/09/11 13:43:48 UTC
[Bug 7619] New: Digest::SHA vs Digest::SHA1 confusion
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7619
Bug ID: 7619
Summary: Digest::SHA vs Digest::SHA1 confusion
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: spamassassin
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: kmcgrail@apache.org
Target Milestone: Undefined
With the addition of sha256 & sha512 signatures, there is now confusion if
Digest::SHA1 is needed for SpamAssassin or not. It is likely needed for the
antiquated razor2 agent.
However, we should likely remove Digest::SHA1 completely from our code and
require Digest::SHA and do this for 4.0.
Marking as a blocker for 4.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7619] Digest::SHA vs Digest::SHA1 confusion
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7619
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@apache.org
Target Milestone|Undefined |4.0.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7619] Digest::SHA vs Digest::SHA1 confusion
Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7619
Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |hege@hege.li
--- Comment #1 from Henrik Krohns <he...@hege.li> ---
It seems I already did this..
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1845409
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.