You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Troy Simpson <tr...@ebswift.com> on 2010/05/09 22:47:29 UTC
RE: Tigris binary packages for Windows
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM
> To: Cooke, Mark
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson
> Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
>
> On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > Hi David, list,
> >
> >
> >>>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
> >>>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
> >>>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
> >>>>> announced a few days ago.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> >>>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
> >>>>
> >>>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
> >>>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
> >>>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
> >>>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
> >>>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
> >>>> I know my build environment is okey.
> >>>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
> >>>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with
> >>> apache 2.2 on windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings
> >>> (to Trac using mod_wsgi) and report back...
> >>>
> >>>
> >> From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> >> Sent: 23 April 2010 18:08
> >>
> >> Thanx that would be gr8.
> >>
> > So far so good. Minor points but the ".11" package readme still
> refers
> > to ".9"
> Oh...thats my fault missing to change the version number in some spots.
> I think I was focused on getting the dependecies versions right.
> > and some of the files have a different name format from the
> > tigris packages, e.g.:
> >
> > o svn-python-1.6.6.win32-py2.6.exe
> > o svn-win32-1.6.11_py.zip
> >
> > ...although I realise one is an installer and the other just the
> files.
> >
> You're right, the first one is an installer and the second one only the
> files.
> If you look at tigris download page a bit further down you see the
> corresponding zip-file there as well.
> I've just havn't looked into byinding these installers.
> > Actually, I am unsure about installing the latter, can I just copy
> the
> > files over the ones I already have installed or do I need to tell
> python
> > about it somehow (probably OT for this list I guess, perhaps Troy is
> > listening)?
> >
> I'm not a python programmer so I don't really know how to install this
> package (thats why the bindings are not tested).
> But I suppose you can just extract the file over the old ones.
> Actually it's not Troy that used to build the python installers, it was
> DJ Heap, who also used to build the binaries.
> Maybe he has some info on this matter.
> >
> >>> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile (there were
> >>> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some
> potential
> >>> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build
> which
> >>>
> > I
> >
> >>> am required to use here):
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
> >> That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be distributed with it.
> >>
> >>
> > Excellent, thanks again.
> >
> >
> >>> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I
> >>> assume that he would be able to put them on tigris at least
> >>> until we get a new home on apache:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to
> >> him as well. So if he is reading it it would be great if he
> >> (or anyone else) want to put the there.
> >>
> >>
> > It would be really great if Troy could pick up the baton here as that
> > would negate my python install issues.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > ~ mark c
> >
>
Looks like we're getting closer to official binaries then... As far as the
python bindings installer goes, that's something I know nothing about. I
have new code for the windows WiX-based installer, but thus far haven't had
any commit access to place the code back in. The WiX code in the repository
has 'issues'.
Regards,
Troy
RE: Tigris binary packages for Windows
Posted by "Cooke, Mark" <ma...@siemens.com>.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM
> > To: Cooke, Mark
> > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson
> > Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows
> >
> > On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > > Hi David, list,
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
> > >>>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
> > >>>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
> > >>>>> announced a few days ago.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> > >>>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
> > >>>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
> > >>>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
> > >>>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
> > >>>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
> > >>>> I know my build environment is okey.
> > >>>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
> > >>>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with
> > >>> apache 2.2 on windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings
> > >>> (to Trac using mod_wsgi) and report back...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> From: David Darj [mailto:zid@alagazam.net]
> > >> Sent: 23 April 2010 18:08
> > >>
> > >> Thanx that would be gr8.
> > >>
> > > So far so good. Minor points but the ".11" package readme still
> > refers
> > > to ".9"
> > Oh...thats my fault missing to change the version number in
> some spots.
> > I think I was focused on getting the dependecies versions right.
> > > and some of the files have a different name format from the
> > > tigris packages, e.g.:
> > >
> > > o svn-python-1.6.6.win32-py2.6.exe
> > > o svn-win32-1.6.11_py.zip
> > >
> > > ...although I realise one is an installer and the other just the
> > files.
> > >
> > You're right, the first one is an installer and the second
> one only the
> > files.
> > If you look at tigris download page a bit further down you see the
> > corresponding zip-file there as well.
> > I've just havn't looked into byinding these installers.
> > > Actually, I am unsure about installing the latter, can I just copy
> > the
> > > files over the ones I already have installed or do I need to tell
> > python
> > > about it somehow (probably OT for this list I guess,
> perhaps Troy is
> > > listening)?
> > >
> > I'm not a python programmer so I don't really know how to
> install this
> > package (thats why the bindings are not tested).
> > But I suppose you can just extract the file over the old ones.
> > Actually it's not Troy that used to build the python
> installers, it was
> > DJ Heap, who also used to build the binaries.
> > Maybe he has some info on this matter.
> > >
> > >>> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile
> (there were
> > >>> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some
> > potential
> > >>> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build
> > which
> > >>>
> > > I
> > >
> > >>> am required to use here):
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
> > >> That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be
> distributed with it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Excellent, thanks again.
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I
> > >>> assume that he would be able to put them on tigris at least
> > >>> until we get a new home on apache:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to
> > >> him as well. So if he is reading it it would be great if he
> > >> (or anyone else) want to put the there.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > It would be really great if Troy could pick up the baton
> here as that
> > > would negate my python install issues.
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > >
> > > ~ mark c
> > >
> >
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Simpson [mailto:troy@ebswift.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2010 23:47
>
> Looks like we're getting closer to official binaries then...
> As far as the python bindings installer goes, that's something
> I know nothing about. I have new code for the windows WiX-based
> installer, but thus far haven't had any commit access to place
> the code back in. The WiX code in the repository has 'issues'.
>
> Regards,
>
> Troy
>
I will try to investigate the python issue but its probably not going to
be this week *sigh*
~ mark c