You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2013/02/23 02:22:32 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
HI,
> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be against policy to sign and release them.
> And what would its path look like?
A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\Flex_SDK_build\
We don't have a 4.9.1 build currently on the CI machine,
Would there be any legal issues re using hudson in path as Oracle owns it?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Posted by Om <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> > We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may
> be
> > against policy to sign and release them.
> >
> >> And what would its path look like?
> > A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
> >
> > f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\Flex_SDK_build\
> >
> > We don't have a 4.9.1 build currently on the CI machine,
> >
> > Would there be any legal issues re using hudson in path as Oracle owns
> it?
> >
> OK, sounds like we need to build a tool to make the paths pretty. Is it
> really worth it? What do you want the path to look like?
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
Why do we need a tool for this? Why cant the release manager just create
the release build from a directory like this: c:/apacheflex_4_9_1/ ?
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
>> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
> against policy to sign and release them.
>
>> And what would its path look like?
> A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
>
> f:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\Flex_SDK_build\
>
> We don't have a 4.9.1 build currently on the CI machine,
>
> Would there be any legal issues re using hudson in path as Oracle owns it?
>
OK, sounds like we need to build a tool to make the paths pretty. Is it
really worth it? What do you want the path to look like?
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui