You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@synapse.apache.org by shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com> on 2020/04/19 03:08:39 UTC
[Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Hi All,
At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
you all think ?
Thanks,
Shafreen
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by Shafreen <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:49 AM Isuru Udana <is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Shafreen,
>
> I have merged the PR.
>
Thanks Isuru!
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:23 PM Shafreen <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Build has passed for this PR. Please do have a look when you all get some
>> free time.
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Shafreen <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya <
>>>> ravi.undupitiya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to
>>>>> be used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <
>>>>> anfar.shafreen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
>>>>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
>>>>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
>>>>>> you all think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Shafreen
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
> --
> *Isuru Udana*
> Associate Director/Architect
>
>
>
> *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: isudana@gmail.com
> <is...@gmail.com> *
>
>
>
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by Isuru Udana <is...@gmail.com>.
Hi Shafreen,
I have merged the PR.
Thanks.
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:23 PM Shafreen <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Build has passed for this PR. Please do have a look when you all get some
> free time.
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Shafreen <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya <
>>> ravi.undupitiya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to
>>>> be used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this.
>>>
>>
>> The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue.
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <
>>>> anfar.shafreen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
>>>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
>>>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
>>>>> you all think ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Shafreen
>>>>>
>>>>
--
*Isuru Udana*
Associate Director/Architect
*; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: isudana@gmail.com
<is...@gmail.com> *
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by Shafreen <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi All,
Build has passed for this PR. Please do have a look when you all get some
free time.
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Shafreen <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya <
>> ravi.undupitiya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to
>>> be used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change
>>> this.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this.
>>
>
> The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue.
>
> https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
>>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
>>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
>>>> you all think ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shafreen
>>>>
>>>
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by Shafreen <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi All
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to be
>> used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change this.
>>
>
> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this.
>
The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue.
https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
>>> you all think ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shafreen
>>>
>>
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya <ra...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to be
> used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change this.
>
Yeah, will send a PR fixing this.
>
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
>> you all think ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shafreen
>>
>
Re: [Message Processor] Fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario
Posted by Ravi Undupitiya <ra...@gmail.com>.
It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to be
used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change this.
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e.
> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario.
> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do
> you all think ?
>
> Thanks,
> Shafreen
>