You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2009/04/21 09:34:39 UTC
JIRA versions
Hi,
I had the intent of helping to go through the open JIRA issues and try
and figure out what is still relevant, etc. as much as possible.
Looking in there, I saw 1.3.x (empty), 1.x (empty), 2.0 (only 5
issues), Future (300 issues), and continuum-netbeans-plugin-1.0
(sandbox, 1 issue which was the import).
- I deleted the netbeans plugin version (we can create a jira project
when it graduates the sandbox)
- I removed 1.3.x, assuming that all known issues before GA go into
1.3.3 and we create versions if we have more releases
- I merged 2.0, Future and 1.x together - unfortunately JIRA did
something weird and moved all the future ones to "unscheduled" - and I
can no longer tell them apart. So now I'm going to have to go through
all 410... :)
I'll slowly start to plow through the unscheduled bucket :) I'm hoping
we can kill 50 or more that are duplicates/fixed/etc. and get back to
a small unscheduled bucket we can be responsive to.
Expect lots of mail :)
As for 1.2.4 - did we come to the conclusion of whether that is ever
going to be released? Bear in mind 1.3.3 now upgrades cleanly from 1.2
without a backup/restore cycle.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
VP Product Development, MaestroDev | bporter@g2ix.com | www.g2ix.com |
+1 310 439 8280 x4859
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2009, at 5:34 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> I'll slowly start to plow through the unscheduled bucket :) I'm hoping we
>> can kill 50 or more that are duplicates/fixed/etc. and get back to a small
>> unscheduled bucket we can be responsive to.
>>
>
> So far, I've already killed about 80. I'm halfway through. The ones I've
> closed, I haven't done a lot to link them to when they were fixed (they may
> be dupes, or stuff might have been done without issues - eitehr way I didn't
> want to modify historical release notes). Some things that have just not had
> interest got closed as well.
>
> Basic approach to scheduling:
> - if it blocks a 1.3 GA, or is some reasonable flaw in new functionality,
> or a regression, it's in 1.3.3 (that might be split into another beta
> release though)
> - if it's something that looks like the very near term or has patches, into
> 1.4.0 or 1.4.x
> - everything else into 1.x that is still relevant
>
> Hope this is ok... sorry about all the mail :)
It is ok, thanks
Emmanuel
>
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 21/04/2009, at 5:34 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I'll slowly start to plow through the unscheduled bucket :) I'm
> hoping we can kill 50 or more that are duplicates/fixed/etc. and get
> back to a small unscheduled bucket we can be responsive to.
So far, I've already killed about 80. I'm halfway through. The ones
I've closed, I haven't done a lot to link them to when they were fixed
(they may be dupes, or stuff might have been done without issues -
eitehr way I didn't want to modify historical release notes). Some
things that have just not had interest got closed as well.
Basic approach to scheduling:
- if it blocks a 1.3 GA, or is some reasonable flaw in new
functionality, or a regression, it's in 1.3.3 (that might be split
into another beta release though)
- if it's something that looks like the very near term or has patches,
into 1.4.0 or 1.4.x
- everything else into 1.x that is still relevant
Hope this is ok... sorry about all the mail :)
Cheers,
Brett
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
I don't think we need to release a new 1.2
Emmanuel
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had the intent of helping to go through the open JIRA issues and try and
> figure out what is still relevant, etc. as much as possible. Looking in
> there, I saw 1.3.x (empty), 1.x (empty), 2.0 (only 5 issues), Future (300
> issues), and continuum-netbeans-plugin-1.0 (sandbox, 1 issue which was the
> import).
>
> - I deleted the netbeans plugin version (we can create a jira project when
> it graduates the sandbox)
> - I removed 1.3.x, assuming that all known issues before GA go into 1.3.3
> and we create versions if we have more releases
> - I merged 2.0, Future and 1.x together - unfortunately JIRA did something
> weird and moved all the future ones to "unscheduled" - and I can no longer
> tell them apart. So now I'm going to have to go through all 410... :)
>
> I'll slowly start to plow through the unscheduled bucket :) I'm hoping we
> can kill 50 or more that are duplicates/fixed/etc. and get back to a small
> unscheduled bucket we can be responsive to.
>
> Expect lots of mail :)
>
> As for 1.2.4 - did we come to the conclusion of whether that is ever going
> to be released? Bear in mind 1.3.3 now upgrades cleanly from 1.2 without a
> backup/restore cycle.
>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> VP Product Development, MaestroDev | bporter@g2ix.com | www.g2ix.com | +1
> 310 439 8280 x4859
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 22/04/2009, at 12:02 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> ok, unless anyone volunteers to do 1.2.4 in the next day or so, I'll
> roll the 1.2.4 issues (including fixed) into 1.3.3 and delete the
> 1.2.x branch in SVN (can go back to the tag if needed).
>
This is done. I don't think this would be my preference in future
since 1.2 is still the GA release, but it's a reversible action (check
the issues@ archive for 7 issues that were changed to 1.3.x, or we
could go back to 1.2.3 for maintenance) if we do need a quick release.
Cheers,
Brett
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 22/04/2009, at 11:54 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> As for 1.2.4 - did we come to the conclusion of whether that is
>> ever going
>> to be released? Bear in mind 1.3.3 now upgrades cleanly from 1.2
>> without a
>> backup/restore cycle.
>
> It does? What issue fixed it?
2147
> (The docs need to be updated.)
will do
>
> In that case, no, I won't bother releasing the Data Management bits
> again. That was all I had planned, to pick up any other changes and
> fix the docs which are wrong.
ok, unless anyone volunteers to do 1.2.4 in the next day or so, I'll
roll the 1.2.4 issues (including fixed) into 1.3.3 and delete the
1.2.x branch in SVN (can go back to the tag if needed).
- Brett
Re: JIRA versions
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> As for 1.2.4 - did we come to the conclusion of whether that is ever going
> to be released? Bear in mind 1.3.3 now upgrades cleanly from 1.2 without a
> backup/restore cycle.
It does? What issue fixed it? (The docs need to be updated.)
In that case, no, I won't bother releasing the Data Management bits
again. That was all I had planned, to pick up any other changes and
fix the docs which are wrong.
--
Wendy