You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> on 2006/12/01 03:23:16 UTC

[VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Here's the background on this vote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html

I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a committer.

+1 (Non-Binding)

Re: Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.

+1

general case this is not recoverable imho.

-igor


On 12/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
> because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.
>
> Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
> a page is just as good. ie.
>
> class MyPage extends WebPage {
>     MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
>         // ... do something with the pars.
>     }
> }
>
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can we have more votes please devs?
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > > committer.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> the World!</a>
>

Re: Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Juergen Donnerstag <ju...@gmail.com>.

+0

Juergen

On 12/2/06, Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You've got your 3x+1 so I won't stand in the way.
>
> +0
>
> Frank
>
> On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, last vote had my +- 0, but that lead to a stale mate which is
> > why this vote was restarted.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
> > > because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.
> > >
> > > Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
> > > a page is just as good. ie.
> > >
> > > class MyPage extends WebPage {
> > >     MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
> > >         // ... do something with the pars.
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Can we have more votes please devs?
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > johan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eelco
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > > > > committer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > ">Wicket</a>
> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > > the World!</a>
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>.

You've got your 3x+1 so I won't stand in the way.

+0

Frank

On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, last vote had my +- 0, but that lead to a stale mate which is
> why this vote was restarted.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
> > because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.
> >
> > Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
> > a page is just as good. ie.
> >
> > class MyPage extends WebPage {
> >     MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
> >         // ... do something with the pars.
> >     }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Can we have more votes please devs?
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > johan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Eelco
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > > > committer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > the World!</a>
> >
>

Re: Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.

Yeah, last vote had my +- 0, but that lead to a stale mate which is
why this vote was restarted.

Eelco


On 12/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
> because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.
>
> Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
> a page is just as good. ie.
>
> class MyPage extends WebPage {
>     MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
>         // ... do something with the pars.
>     }
> }
>
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can we have more votes please devs?
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > > >
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > > > >
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > > committer.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> the World!</a>
>

Re: Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.

+0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.

Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
a page is just as good. ie.

class MyPage extends WebPage {
    MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
        // ... do something with the pars.
    }
}



On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we have more votes please devs?
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> >
> > +1
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > > >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > committer.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
the World!</a>

Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.

Can we have more votes please devs?

Eelco


On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
>
> +1
>
> johan
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> > >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > >
> > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > committer.
> > >
> > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.

nowadays i hate checked exceptions..

+1

johan


On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's the background on this vote:
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> >
> > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> committer.
> >
> > +1 (Non-Binding)
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Change StringValueConversionException to Unchecked

Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.

+1

Eelco


On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the background on this vote:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09093.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
>
> I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a committer.
>
> +1 (Non-Binding)
>
>