You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Edward Ribeiro (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/08 17:36:22 UTC
[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (ZOOKEEPER-2517) jute.maxbuffer is
ignored
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Edward Ribeiro updated ZOOKEEPER-2517:
--------------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: It has been updated. LGTM.)
> jute.maxbuffer is ignored
> -------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2517
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.5.2
> Reporter: Benjamin Jaton
> Assignee: Arshad Mohammad
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2517-01.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2517-02.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2517.patch
>
>
> In ClientCnxnSocket.java the parsing of the system property is erroneous:
> {code}packetLen = Integer.getInteger(
> clientConfig.getProperty(ZKConfig.JUTE_MAXBUFFER),
> ZKClientConfig.CLIENT_MAX_PACKET_LENGTH_DEFAULT
> );{code}
> Javadoc of Integer.getInteger states "The first argument is treated as the name of a system property", whereas here the value of the property is passed.
> Instead I believe the author meant to write something like:
> {code}packetLen = Integer.parseInt(
> clientConfig.getProperty(
> ZKConfig.JUTE_MAXBUFFER,
> String.valueOf(ZKClientConfig.CLIENT_MAX_PACKET_LENGTH_DEFAULT)
> )
> );{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)