You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomee.apache.org by Daniel Rucker <dj...@gmail.com> on 2022/03/25 21:32:37 UTC
Arquillian, TomEE 8.0.10, and JUnit5
Has anybody successfully made this combination work and have an example by
chance? We are trying to write a test case that will validate JSF pages
and haven't had much luck.
--
Danny
Happiness isn't good enough for me any longer. I demand EUPHORIA! -Calvin
Re: Arquillian, TomEE 8.0.10, and JUnit5
Posted by "Zowalla, Richard" <ri...@hs-heilbronn.de>.
Hi Daniel,
there is a JUnit 5 / Arquillian example available [1].
The important thing (as far as I remember my past self 12 months ago)
is, that we need to use a alpha version of arquillian for JUnit 5
support [2], i.e. >= 1.7.0.Alpha5
Gruß
Richard
[1]
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/tomee-8.x/examples/junit5-arquillian-multiple-tomee
[2]
https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-core/issues/137#issuecomment-726596414
Am Freitag, dem 25.03.2022 um 16:32 -0500 schrieb Daniel Rucker:
> Has anybody successfully made this combination work and have an
> example by
> chance? We are trying to write a test case that will validate JSF
> pages
> and haven't had much luck.
>
Re: Arquillian, TomEE 8.0.10, and JUnit5
Posted by Daniel Rucker <dj...@gmail.com>.
Thank you. Those seemed to get us pointed in the right direction.
Danny
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 3:12 PM Kean Erickson <ke...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, that combo works for me for classes, but I don't know about jsf pages.
>
> If you are using maven, Make sure you're using the junit-jupiter package,
> and try mvn dependency:tree to make sure nothing else in your project is
> trying to include junit 4. You'll potentially have to excluse it for any
> offenders.
>
> Good luck
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, 2:32 PM Daniel Rucker <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anybody successfully made this combination work and have an example
> by
> > chance? We are trying to write a test case that will validate JSF pages
> > and haven't had much luck.
> >
> > --
> > Danny
> > Happiness isn't good enough for me any longer. I demand EUPHORIA!
> -Calvin
> >
>
--
Daniel Rucker
Happiness isn't good enough for me any longer. I demand EUPHORIA!
Re: Arquillian, TomEE 8.0.10, and JUnit5
Posted by Kean Erickson <ke...@gmail.com>.
Yes, that combo works for me for classes, but I don't know about jsf pages.
If you are using maven, Make sure you're using the junit-jupiter package,
and try mvn dependency:tree to make sure nothing else in your project is
trying to include junit 4. You'll potentially have to excluse it for any
offenders.
Good luck
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, 2:32 PM Daniel Rucker <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anybody successfully made this combination work and have an example by
> chance? We are trying to write a test case that will validate JSF pages
> and haven't had much luck.
>
> --
> Danny
> Happiness isn't good enough for me any longer. I demand EUPHORIA! -Calvin
>