You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Adrian Crum <ad...@hlmksw.com> on 2010/02/15 16:46:59 UTC

Re: svn commit: r910096 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion/Converters.java

doogie@apache.org wrote:
> Author: doogie
> Date: Sun Feb 14 22:34:46 2010
> New Revision: 910096
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910096&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement unsynchronized(non-blocking) access to converterMap and
> noConversion.
> 
> Modified:
>     ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion/Converters.java

Adam,

Do you know of any advantages/disadvantages of using FastMap versus 
ConcurrentHashMap?

Re: svn commit: r910096 - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion/Converters.java

Posted by Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>.

Adrian Crum wrote:
> doogie@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: doogie
>> Date: Sun Feb 14 22:34:46 2010
>> New Revision: 910096
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910096&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Implement unsynchronized(non-blocking) access to converterMap and
>> noConversion.
>>
>> Modified:
>>    
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion/Converters.java
> 
> Adam,
> 
> Do you know of any advantages/disadvantages of using FastMap versus
> ConcurrentHashMap?

FastMap is more stable with regard to memory allocation.  It might be
a tad slower because of this, but it's execution profile doesn't vary
as much.