You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2010/08/19 19:51:08 UTC
dev@ and users@ need more moderators?
So, artagnon mailed yesterday a note to users@, CCing me. And now,
23 hours later, I notice it isn't on the list yet.
Joe Schaefer from ASF Infra confirms that there are quite a few legitimate
messages pending moderation on the users@subversion.apache.org list. In
other words, it seems that the moderators aren't approving messages to go
through.
Current moderators, is that indeed the situation?
@all, do we need more moderators on users@?
Daniel
(BCCing users-owner@)
Re: dev@ and users@ need more moderators?
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
I normally moderate messages through quite actively, but have been
remiss this week. IOW, "normally" messages shouldn't ever hang out for
very long. I slacked off this week, thinking others would pick up the
slack. Guess I was wrong :-P
More moderators never hurts, of course. For those wondering, I think
the moderation load is 5-10 messages a day. A simple Reply-All and
"send" is all that is required (to moderate through, and to put the
person on the "allow" list so future messages do not require
moderation).
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:52, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:51:08 +0300:
>> @all, do we need more moderators on users@?
>
> By the way, exactly the same people moderate dev@ and users@. (i.e.,
> users-owner@ and dev-owner@ both go to the same 4 people.) So I imagine
> that, inasmuch there is a problem, it would apply to both lists.
>
> Daniel
> (the dev@ moderation queue currently contains only one message, which is
> only an hour old)
>
Re: dev@ and users@ need more moderators?
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:51:08 +0300:
> @all, do we need more moderators on users@?
By the way, exactly the same people moderate dev@ and users@. (i.e.,
users-owner@ and dev-owner@ both go to the same 4 people.) So I imagine
that, inasmuch there is a problem, it would apply to both lists.
Daniel
(the dev@ moderation queue currently contains only one message, which is
only an hour old)