You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by co...@apache.org on 2019/08/08 13:08:33 UTC
svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Author: covener
Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
New Revision: 1864701
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
Log:
no votes for APLOGNO commits.
99% sure but please reply
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
. documentation
. non-Unix build
. non-Unix, single-platform code
+ . routine APLOGNO() backports
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Jan Ehrhardt <ph...@ehrhardt.nl>.
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:43:46 +0200):
>Are the reported APLOGNO all going to be solved in .41:
>
>mod_proxy mod_http2 mod_ssl
In mod_md.c I se no APLOGNO() without argument anymore, so they must be
gone. For instance, 2 out of three directly after line 600 were without
argument in .40 and generated the warning. Now they have an argument:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/md/mod_md.c?diff_format=h&view=markup#l600
FWIW: +1
--
Jan
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>.
Are the reported APLOGNO all going to be solved in .41:
mod_proxy mod_http2 mod_ssl
> Op 8 aug. 2019 om 15:09 heeft Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
> CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Author: covener
>> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> New Revision: 1864701
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
>> Log:
>> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>>
>> 99% sure but please reply
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
>> . documentation
>> . non-Unix build
>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>> + . routine APLOGNO() backports
>>
>> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 08/08/2019 10:53 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> +1
>
> Le 08/08/2019 à 15:09, Eric Covener a écrit :
>> CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: covener
>>> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>>> New Revision: 1864701
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>>>
>>> 99% sure but please reply
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>>
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
>>> . documentation
>>> . non-Unix build
>>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>>> + . routine APLOGNO() backports
>>>
>>> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Christophe JAILLET <ch...@wanadoo.fr>.
+1
Le 08/08/2019 à 15:09, Eric Covener a écrit :
> CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: covener
>> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> New Revision: 1864701
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
>> Log:
>> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>>
>> 99% sure but please reply
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
>> . documentation
>> . non-Unix build
>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>> + . routine APLOGNO() backports
>>
>> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 09:09:57AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: covener
> > Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
> > New Revision: 1864701
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
> > Log:
> > no votes for APLOGNO commits.
> >
> > 99% sure but please reply
+1
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Daniel Ruggeri <dr...@apache.org>.
+1
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On August 8, 2019 8:09:57 AM CDT, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
>
>On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Author: covener
>> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> New Revision: 1864701
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
>> Log:
>> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>>
>> 99% sure but please reply
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> URL:
>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
>>
>==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
>> . documentation
>> . non-Unix build
>> . non-Unix, single-platform code
>> + . routine APLOGNO() backports
>>
>> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Eric Covener
>covener@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
CC dev@ I assumed this was safe to just assert.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Author: covener
> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
> New Revision: 1864701
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
> Log:
> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>
> 99% sure but please reply
>
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864701&r1=1864700&r2=1864701&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
> . documentation
> . non-Unix build
> . non-Unix, single-platform code
> + . routine APLOGNO() backports
>
> RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>
>
>
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r1864701 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Author: covener
> Date: Thu Aug 8 13:08:33 2019
> New Revision: 1864701
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864701&view=rev
> Log:
> no votes for APLOGNO commits.
>
> 99% sure but please reply
I didn't mean to be this needy, I meant if you object :)