You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/03 07:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-16737) camel-core - Transacted vs reactive routing engine

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-16737:
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 4.0
                       (was: 3.x)

> camel-core - Transacted vs reactive routing engine
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-16737
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16737
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Lets look at if we can make transacted work better with the reactive routing engine.
> See CAMEL-16734 and the ticket it mentions for background.
> Maybe we could let the routing engine be aware if a task is under transaction and execute it synchronously via its current thread, and ensure any other tasks that this thread or exchange is providing to the reactive engine is processed under the transaction via that same thread.
> At this movement its the EIP implementation that need to splitup their tasks into transacted vs non-transacted which would ideally be avoided. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)