You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@tez.apache.org by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2016/07/20 16:57:25 UTC
Failed: TEZ-3357 PreCommit Build #1862
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3357
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1862/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4116 lines...]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf :tez-api
[INFO] Build failures were ignored.
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819031/TEZ-3357.03.patch
against master revision 280a98e.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 1 warning messages.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1862//artifact/patchprocess/diffJavadocWarnings.txt for details.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in :
org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration
org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1862//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1862//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
b778b68fedbda5e5fe44c01e5b11868ffa94b093 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration.testKeySet
Error Message:
field TEZ_HISTORY_LOGGING_USED_NUM_DAGS_PER_GROUP do not have annotation of ConfigurationScope.
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: field TEZ_HISTORY_LOGGING_USED_NUM_DAGS_PER_GROUP do not have annotation of ConfigurationScope.
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:621)
at org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration.testKeySet(TestTezConfiguration.java:66)
FAILED: org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources
Error Message:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1254)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 1202421415
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 1275603635,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 741045444,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
Stack Trace:
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.WantedButNotInvoked:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1254)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 1202421415
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 1275603635,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 741045444,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1254)
Success: TEZ-3357 PreCommit Build #1866
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3357
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1866/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4136 lines...]
[INFO] Tez ............................................... SUCCESS [ 0.045 s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 58:27 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-07-21T05:15:43+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 78M/1232M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819236/TEZ-3357.06.patch
against master revision 280a98e.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1866//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1866//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
d6dc4de18430d92e137451bc5da12c82f5ef361a logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Archiving artifacts
[description-setter] Description set: TEZ-3357
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Success
Sending email for trigger: Success
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
All tests passed
Failed: TEZ-3368 PreCommit Build #1865
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3368
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1865/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4123 lines...]
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-07-21T05:12:58+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 71M/967M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819210/TEZ-3368.001.patch
against master revision 280a98e.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1865//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1865//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstez-dag.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1865//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
6c40a0bba730b3576031e2c72ff82a8bc6e5eb15 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Compressed 3.20 MB of artifacts by 26.3% relative to #1860
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
All tests passed
Failed: TEZ-3368 PreCommit Build #1864
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3368
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1864/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4126 lines...]
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-07-21T01:39:19+00:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 75M/979M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819210/TEZ-3368.001.patch
against master revision 280a98e.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1864//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1864//artifact/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningstez-dag.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1864//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
0609e0316c225c2218bf990f108a6c87461acd26 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Compressed 3.21 MB of artifacts by 26.3% relative to #1860
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
All tests passed
Failed: TEZ-3357 PreCommit Build #1863
Posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org>.
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3357
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1863/
###################################################################################
########################## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ###########################
[...truncated 4147 lines...]
[ERROR] [Help 2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
[ERROR]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR] mvn <goals> -rf :tez-api
[INFO] Build failures were ignored.
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12819158/TEZ-3357.04.patch
against master revision 280a98e.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in :
org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration
org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse
Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1863//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TEZ-Build/1863//console
This message is automatically generated.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Adding comment to Jira.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Comment added.
6ada81c43197d9e28ea92d185c20ef81a1f6f5b3 logged out
======================================================================
======================================================================
Finished build.
======================================================================
======================================================================
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
[description-setter] Could not determine description.
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
###################################################################################
############################## FAILED TESTS (if any) ##############################
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration.testKeySet
Error Message:
field TEZ_HISTORY_LOGGING_USED_NUM_DAGS_PER_GROUP do not have annotation of ConfigurationScope.
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: field TEZ_HISTORY_LOGGING_USED_NUM_DAGS_PER_GROUP do not have annotation of ConfigurationScope.
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:621)
at org.apache.tez.dag.api.TestTezConfiguration.testKeySet(TestTezConfiguration.java:66)
FAILED: org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources
Error Message:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000004_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 2143070567
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 991292085,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 467939169,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1259)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1269)
Stack Trace:
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.WantedButNotInvoked:
Wanted but not invoked:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000004_1,
<any>,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)
However, there were other interactions with this mock:
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.init(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setConfig(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceInit(
Configuration: core-default.xml, core-site.xml, yarn-default.xml, yarn-site.xml
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1143)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.start();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.serviceStart();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.instantiateSchedulers(
"host",
0,
"",
Mock for AppContext, hashCode: 2143070567
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getContainerSignatureMatcher();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getConfig();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1144)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.setApplicationRegistrationData(
0,
Mock for Resource, hashCode: 991292085,
Mock for Map, hashCode: 467939169,
null
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.setApplicationRegistrationData(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:96)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.getSpyTaskScheduler();
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1146)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1208)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1211)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000001_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1227)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000002_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1241)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1251)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.taskAllocated(
0,
Mock for TA attempt_0_0001_0_01_000003_1,
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST,
Container: [ContainerId: container_1_0001_01_000001, NodeId: host1:0, NodeHttpAddress: host1:0, Resource: <memory:1024, vCores:1>, Priority: 1, Token: null, ]
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TaskSchedulerContextImpl.taskAllocated(TaskSchedulerContextImpl.java:69)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_ENDED
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1259)
taskSchedulerManagerForTest.handleEvent(
EventType: S_TA_LAUNCH_REQUEST
);
-> at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1269)
at org.apache.tez.dag.app.rm.TestContainerReuse.testReuseConflictLocalResources(TestContainerReuse.java:1272)