You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> on 2011/10/19 01:46:41 UTC
An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Hey devs,
Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
My concerns are:
- Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's not
even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
- Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
- Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect. Can't be
too bad tho.
Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
J-D
Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Posted by Eric Yang <ey...@hortonworks.com>.
At Hortonworks, we have tested Hadoop 0.20.205.0 with HBase 0.90.4 with patch:
HBASE-4415, HBASE-4498, HBASE-4523, HBASE-4535
At the same time, the same patches also work for HBase 0.92 and Hadoop
0.20.205.0
combination for both secure and unsecured installation.
regards,
Eric
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Amandeep Khurana <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it makes sense to have 0.92 as the release for 0.20.205. There is no
> real advantage in having an interim release with not many added features
> just because there is a new Hadoop release out there that we think works
> better. Also, it'll give time to test out stability of 0.20.205.
>
> Just my $0.02...
>
> -ak
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We've been testing security features proposed for 0.92 with 0.20.205 with a
>> patch to 205 to make testing easier (not needed for users). 0.92 is a good
>> candidate to be "the release" for 0.20.205.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> >From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>> >To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> >Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:48 PM
>> >Subject: Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
>> >
>> >Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
>> >
>> >Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey devs,
>> >>
>> >> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
>> >> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
>> >> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
>> >> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
>> >>
>> >> My concerns are:
>> >>
>> >> - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's
>> not
>> >> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
>> >> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
>> >> - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
>> >> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
>> >> - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect.
>> Can't
>> >> be
>> >> too bad tho.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
>> >>
>> >> J-D
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Posted by Amandeep Khurana <am...@gmail.com>.
I think it makes sense to have 0.92 as the release for 0.20.205. There is no
real advantage in having an interim release with not many added features
just because there is a new Hadoop release out there that we think works
better. Also, it'll give time to test out stability of 0.20.205.
Just my $0.02...
-ak
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> We've been testing security features proposed for 0.92 with 0.20.205 with a
> patch to 205 to make testing easier (not needed for users). 0.92 is a good
> candidate to be "the release" for 0.20.205.
>
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
> >________________________________
> >From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:48 PM
> >Subject: Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
> >
> >Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
> >
> >Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hey devs,
> >>
> >> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
> >> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
> >> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
> >> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
> >>
> >> My concerns are:
> >>
> >> - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's
> not
> >> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
> >> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
> >> - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
> >> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
> >> - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect.
> Can't
> >> be
> >> too bad tho.
> >>
> >> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
> >>
> >> J-D
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
We've been testing security features proposed for 0.92 with 0.20.205 with a patch to 205 to make testing easier (not needed for users). 0.92 is a good candidate to be "the release" for 0.20.205.
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
>________________________________
>From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:48 PM
>Subject: Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
>
>Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
>
>Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
>
>Cheers
>
>On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hey devs,
>>
>> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
>> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
>> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
>> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
>>
>> My concerns are:
>>
>> - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's not
>> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
>> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
>> - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
>> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
>> - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect. Can't
>> be
>> too bad tho.
>>
>> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
>>
>> J-D
>>
>
>
>
Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
Cheers
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hey devs,
>
> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
>
> My concerns are:
>
> - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's not
> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
> - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
> - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect. Can't
> be
> too bad tho.
>
> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
>
> J-D
>
Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey devs,
>
> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever?
The approach we are taking in Bigtop for releasing a Hadoop stack based on
0.20.205 is to recompile with -Dhadoop.version=0.20.205.0. If you're interested
in helping us test that, please drop by the bigtop-dev mailing list. We'll start
publishing RPM/DEBs for testing very soon and the announcement will be made
over there.
Thanks,
Roman.