You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/14 11:18:16 UTC
Is this warning expected?
Hi
I ran SOLR tests today and I've noticed this print appearing several times:
[junit]
[junit] ------------- Standard Error -----------------
[junit] 14.okt.2010 12:14:28
org.apache.solr.common.util.ConcurrentLRUCache finalize
[junit] SEVERE: ConcurrentLRUCache was not destroyed prior to
finalize(), indicates a bug -- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!
[junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
Is this expected? Can it be ignored?
Also, not sure where it's coming from, but notice this typo:
14.okt.2010 --> okt instead of oct I assume. Is it something defined in SOLR
code?
Shai
Re: Is this warning expected?
Posted by Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the explanation Robert !
Shai
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I ran SOLR tests today and I've noticed this print appearing several
> times:
> >
> > [junit]
> > [junit] ------------- Standard Error -----------------
> > [junit] 14.okt.2010 12:14:28
> > org.apache.solr.common.util.ConcurrentLRUCache finalize
> > [junit] SEVERE: ConcurrentLRUCache was not destroyed prior to
> > finalize(), indicates a bug -- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!
> > [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
> >
> > Is this expected? Can it be ignored?
> >
> > Also, not sure where it's coming from, but notice this typo:
> >
> > 14.okt.2010 --> okt instead of oct I assume. Is it something defined in
> SOLR
> > code?
>
> I can't answer the first question (lots of tests give me this
> ConcurrentLRUCache warning, but the date format is because we switch
> up the locale when running tests, so sometimes you see SCHWERWIEGEND,
> GRAVE, etc instead of SEVERE, and also different date formats.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Is this warning expected?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I ran SOLR tests today and I've noticed this print appearing several times:
>
> [junit]
> [junit] ------------- Standard Error -----------------
> [junit] 14.okt.2010 12:14:28
> org.apache.solr.common.util.ConcurrentLRUCache finalize
> [junit] SEVERE: ConcurrentLRUCache was not destroyed prior to
> finalize(), indicates a bug -- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!
> [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
>
> Is this expected? Can it be ignored?
>
> Also, not sure where it's coming from, but notice this typo:
>
> 14.okt.2010 --> okt instead of oct I assume. Is it something defined in SOLR
> code?
I can't answer the first question (lots of tests give me this
ConcurrentLRUCache warning, but the date format is because we switch
up the locale when running tests, so sometimes you see SCHWERWIEGEND,
GRAVE, etc instead of SEVERE, and also different date formats.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Is this warning expected?
Posted by Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Yonik Seeley
> <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll try and take another look after we get the test logging straitened out.
>>
>
> we can turn back on forking for each solr test to workaround it?
I just tried that - doesn't seem to work.
More tests have INFO logging, but many still do not.
I did this:
- forkmode="perBatch"
+ fork="true"
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Is this warning expected?
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Yonik Seeley
<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> I'll try and take another look after we get the test logging straitened out.
>
we can turn back on forking for each solr test to workaround it? I
don't understand the logging and this would make tests much slower,
but logging would work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Is this warning expected?
Posted by Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran SOLR tests today and I've noticed this print appearing several times:
>
> [junit]
> [junit] ------------- Standard Error -----------------
> [junit] 14.okt.2010 12:14:28
> org.apache.solr.common.util.ConcurrentLRUCache finalize
> [junit] SEVERE: ConcurrentLRUCache was not destroyed prior to
> finalize(), indicates a bug -- POSSIBLE RESOURCE LEAK!!!
> [junit] ------------- ---------------- ---------------
>
> Is this expected? Can it be ignored?
I think these are all probably test bugs that don't properly close resources.
When I did a full "ant test" I saw these in DirectUpdateHandlerTest...
*but* when I ran that test alone, I didn't see the warnings.
I'll try and take another look after we get the test logging straitened out.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org