You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@mesos.apache.org by craig w <co...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/18 13:51:07 UTC
mesos 0.24 released?
has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the tarball
is from september 4
http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by craig w <co...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for following up.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Vinod Kone <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Published the blogpost for 24.0.
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:42 PM, CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh,
>>
>> Here is a link that explains the Variable meanings for the packages
>> downloaded by gentoo's package manager, portage::
>>
>> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/
>>
>> I really am at the stage that I want/need to test many tarball releases
>> and also to start testing on other architectures, like aarch64.
>> Please advise on the location(s) of these tarballs, even if they
>> are not formal releases or release candidates.
>>
>> Is anyone testing tarball compilations on other arches?
>> Do I need to start reading the dev list for this sort of granularity?
>> All suggestions are most welcome
>>
>>
>> curiously,
>> James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm confused. Here at gentoo, we usually (almost always) follow the
>>> release numbers including the full minor release number designations
>>> of the tarball. So if I download a tarball, it's not references by minor
>>> release number?
>>>
>>> Here is a simple, quick example::
>>>
>>> www-client/seamonkey Available versions: 2.33.1-r1 2.35
>>>
>>> This accuracy is quintessentially necessary for the gentoo community.
>>> Do I have to fix the name of the tarballs manually? In gentoo ebuilds,
>>> the files that download, the tarballs directly from a source repo
>>> the exact and complete version number is necessary. Should
>>> I use github?
>>>
>>> What are recommendations for this?
>>>
>>> Here is what I'm using for mesos' current ebuild::
>>>
>>> SRC_URI="http://apache.org/dist/${PN}/${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
>>>
>>>
>>> curiously,
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
https://github.com/mindscratch
https://www.google.com/+CraigWickesser
https://twitter.com/mind_scratch
https://twitter.com/craig_links
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@apache.org>.
Published the blogpost for 24.0.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:42 PM, CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Oh,
>
> Here is a link that explains the Variable meanings for the packages
> downloaded by gentoo's package manager, portage::
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/
>
> I really am at the stage that I want/need to test many tarball releases
> and also to start testing on other architectures, like aarch64.
> Please advise on the location(s) of these tarballs, even if they
> are not formal releases or release candidates.
>
> Is anyone testing tarball compilations on other arches?
> Do I need to start reading the dev list for this sort of granularity?
> All suggestions are most welcome
>
>
> curiously,
> James
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm confused. Here at gentoo, we usually (almost always) follow the
>> release numbers including the full minor release number designations
>> of the tarball. So if I download a tarball, it's not references by minor
>> release number?
>>
>> Here is a simple, quick example::
>>
>> www-client/seamonkey Available versions: 2.33.1-r1 2.35
>>
>> This accuracy is quintessentially necessary for the gentoo community.
>> Do I have to fix the name of the tarballs manually? In gentoo ebuilds,
>> the files that download, the tarballs directly from a source repo
>> the exact and complete version number is necessary. Should
>> I use github?
>>
>> What are recommendations for this?
>>
>> Here is what I'm using for mesos' current ebuild::
>>
>> SRC_URI="http://apache.org/dist/${PN}/${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
>>
>>
>> curiously,
>> James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com>.
Oh,
Here is a link that explains the Variable meanings for the packages
downloaded by gentoo's package manager, portage::
https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/
I really am at the stage that I want/need to test many tarball releases
and also to start testing on other architectures, like aarch64.
Please advise on the location(s) of these tarballs, even if they
are not formal releases or release candidates.
Is anyone testing tarball compilations on other arches?
Do I need to start reading the dev list for this sort of granularity?
All suggestions are most welcome
curiously,
James
> I'm confused. Here at gentoo, we usually (almost always) follow the
> release numbers including the full minor release number designations
> of the tarball. So if I download a tarball, it's not references by minor
> release number?
>
> Here is a simple, quick example::
>
> www-client/seamonkey Available versions: 2.33.1-r1 2.35
>
> This accuracy is quintessentially necessary for the gentoo community.
> Do I have to fix the name of the tarballs manually? In gentoo ebuilds,
> the files that download, the tarballs directly from a source repo
> the exact and complete version number is necessary. Should
> I use github?
>
> What are recommendations for this?
>
> Here is what I'm using for mesos' current ebuild::
>
> SRC_URI="http://apache.org/dist/${PN}/${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
>
>
> curiously,
> James
>
>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by CCAAT <cc...@tampabay.rr.com>.
On 09/18/2015 01:33 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:31 AM, craig w <codecraig@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Gotcha will there be a blog post / release announcement on the
> website soon?
>
>
> yea i'll get to it. sorry for the delay.
I'm confused. Here at gentoo, we usually (almost always) follow the
release numbers including the full minor release number designations
of the tarball. So if I download a tarball, it's not references by minor
release number?
Here is a simple, quick example::
www-client/seamonkey Available versions: 2.33.1-r1 2.35
This accuracy is quintessentially necessary for the gentoo community.
Do I have to fix the name of the tarballs manually? In gentoo ebuilds,
the files that download, the tarballs directly from a source repo
the exact and complete version number is necessary. Should
I use github?
What are recommendations for this?
Here is what I'm using for mesos' current ebuild::
SRC_URI="http://apache.org/dist/${PN}/${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
curiously,
James
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:31 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gotcha will there be a blog post / release announcement on the website
> soon?
>
yea i'll get to it. sorry for the delay.
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by craig w <co...@gmail.com>.
Gotcha will there be a blog post / release announcement on the website soon?
On Sep 18, 2015 2:12 PM, "Greg Mann" <gr...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> Hi Craig,
> 0.24.0 has been released, the vote that selected 0.24.0-rc2 as the final
> release passed on Sept. 4, which matches the date from that tarball.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So RC releases are still going out, it's not yet "final"?
>> On Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM, "Joris Van Remoortere" <jo...@mesosphere.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
>>> 0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
>>> chain on the dev list.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the
>>>> tarball is from september 4
>>>>
>>>> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Niklas Nielsen <ni...@mesosphere.io>.
On 18 September 2015 at 11:19, Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me> wrote:
> Hey Mesosphere peeps, on a related note, can
> https://mesosphere.com/downloads/ be updated as well? :)
>
>
Hey Yan,
We are working on it :)
Niklas
> --
> Jiang Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Greg Mann <gr...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>
>> Hi Craig,
>> 0.24.0 has been released, the vote that selected 0.24.0-rc2 as the final
>> release passed on Sept. 4, which matches the date from that tarball.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Greg
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So RC releases are still going out, it's not yet "final"?
>>> On Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM, "Joris Van Remoortere" <jo...@mesosphere.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
>>>> 0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
>>>> chain on the dev list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the
>>>>> tarball is from september 4
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me>.
Hey Mesosphere peeps, on a related note, can
https://mesosphere.com/downloads/ be updated as well? :)
--
Jiang Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Greg Mann <gr...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> Hi Craig,
> 0.24.0 has been released, the vote that selected 0.24.0-rc2 as the final
> release passed on Sept. 4, which matches the date from that tarball.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So RC releases are still going out, it's not yet "final"?
>> On Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM, "Joris Van Remoortere" <jo...@mesosphere.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
>>> 0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
>>> chain on the dev list.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the
>>>> tarball is from september 4
>>>>
>>>> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Greg Mann <gr...@mesosphere.io>.
Hi Craig,
0.24.0 has been released, the vote that selected 0.24.0-rc2 as the final
release passed on Sept. 4, which matches the date from that tarball.
Cheers,
Greg
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:57 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So RC releases are still going out, it's not yet "final"?
> On Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM, "Joris Van Remoortere" <jo...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
>
>> Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
>> 0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
>> chain on the dev list.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the
>>> tarball is from september 4
>>>
>>> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>>>
>>
>>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by craig w <co...@gmail.com>.
So RC releases are still going out, it's not yet "final"?
On Sep 18, 2015 12:15 PM, "Joris Van Remoortere" <jo...@mesosphere.io>
wrote:
> Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
> 0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
> chain on the dev list.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the tarball
>> is from september 4
>>
>> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>>
>
>
Re: mesos 0.24 released?
Posted by Joris Van Remoortere <jo...@mesosphere.io>.
Mesos 0.24.0 was indeed released.
0.24.0 rc2 was voted in on september 4th. You can see the voting e-mail
chain on the dev list.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, craig w <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> has mesos 0.24 been released? it's on the downloads page, but the tarball
> is from september 4
>
> http://mesos.apache.org/downloads/
>