You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Ryan Ollos <ry...@wandisco.com> on 2012/10/26 10:19:45 UTC
Fwd: FW: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting
sample fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Trac Project [mailto:noreply@edgewall.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47
> Cc: trac-tickets@lynx.edgewall.com
> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample
> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences
> for browsers other than firefox
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
> Reporter: Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…> | Owner:
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: normal | Milestone:
> Component: rendering | Version:
> Severity: normal | Resolution:
> Keywords: |
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
> Release Notes:
>
>
> API Changes:
>
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
> Comment (by cboos):
> [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was not
> obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both ;-)
I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound
(in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get some
other opinions.
Re: Fwd: FW: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting
sample fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
bh because bd may be confusing ... ;)
On 10/26/12, Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 26/10/12 09:19, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: The Trac Project [mailto:noreply@edgewall.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47
>>> Cc: trac-tickets@lynx.edgewall.com
>>> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting
>>> sample
>>> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
>>> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences
>>> for browsers other than firefox
>>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>>> Reporter: Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…> | Owner:
>>> Type: defect | Status: new
>>> Priority: normal | Milestone:
>>> Component: rendering | Version:
>>> Severity: normal | Resolution:
>>> Keywords: |
>>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>>> Release Notes:
>>>
>>>
>>> API Changes:
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>>> Comment (by cboos):
>>> [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was
>>> not
>>> obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both
>>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound
>> (in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get
>> some
>> other opinions.
>>
>
> Given that many of us unofficially use and understand bh as bloodhound,
> that would seem most useful. Why not?
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
--
Regards,
Olemis.
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Featured article:
Re: Fwd: FW: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting
sample fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
On 26/10/12 09:19, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The Trac Project [mailto:noreply@edgewall.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47
>> Cc: trac-tickets@lynx.edgewall.com
>> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample
>> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
>> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences
>> for browsers other than firefox
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>> Reporter: Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…> | Owner:
>> Type: defect | Status: new
>> Priority: normal | Milestone:
>> Component: rendering | Version:
>> Severity: normal | Resolution:
>> Keywords: |
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>> Release Notes:
>>
>>
>> API Changes:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>> Comment (by cboos):
>> [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was not
>> obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both ;-)
>
>
> I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound
> (in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get some
> other opinions.
>
Given that many of us unofficially use and understand bh as bloodhound,
that would seem most useful. Why not?
Cheers,
Gary