You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/03/20 03:12:32 UTC
[jira] Created: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
----------------------------
Key: SOLR-192
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: search
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Will Johnson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523042 ]
Will Johnson commented on SOLR-192:
-----------------------------------
is anyone currently working on doing this migration? i submitted a patch to the lucene project tracker (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-989) and was going to post a patch for solr to use the new features but the implementations look to be reasonably different.
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549826 ]
Doron Cohen commented on SOLR-192:
----------------------------------
There are some changes pending in Lucene search.function that I am about to commit.
I would like to first make change that these changes are not conflicting with any
new functionality in Solr.
Can someone from the Solr project contribute the content of current
search.function package of solr (under both java and test) to LUCENE-1085 .
Thanks,
Doron
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Doron Cohen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549018 ]
Doron Cohen commented on SOLR-192:
----------------------------------
Lucene's o.a.l.search.function was added recently, though it does
not contain everything that is in Solr's search.function.
If Solr is committed to move and use Lucene's package instead,
I will work on that in Lucene, but I wanted to make sure first that
this is going to happen.
Thanks,
Doron
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Will Johnson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Will Johnson updated SOLR-192:
------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
patch attached that uses the functionality from lucene instead of solr. there were some changes in the api in the solr->lucene transition so there was one api change to a private static method in solr.search.QueryParsing. this patch also relies on LUCENE-989 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-989) to get access to field names. a future patch could then get access to the statistics for exposing in results.
- will
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549495 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-192:
---------------------------------------
I think that's the plan/hope - move the whole thing to Lucene.
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-192) Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550435 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-192:
-----------------------------------
{code}
There are some changes pending in Lucene search.function that I am about to commit.
I would like to first make change that these changes are not conflicting with any
new functionality in Solr.
{code}
Doron, I'd just go ahead and make whatever changes you see fit in Lucene, and Solr should be able to adapt to it when someone gets that particular itch to scratch. It's not like we can make a backward compatible change at the source level in solr-land anyway (because of package + class name changes).
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.