You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/09 19:48:22 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug fixes
[1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
The tarballs are here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your vote
counts!
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks in advance,
Christian
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by David Karlsen <da...@gmail.com>.
You can use the enforcer plugin to enforce stuff (and optionally have it
active in a profile to only run when you want/during preparing a release):
http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/maven-enforcer-plugin/
Animal sniffer could be something to look into as an alternative if you in
fact want to build on another JDK, but check API signatures:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/
2013/4/10 Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> Yeah this early in the VOTE it could IMHO be a good idea to redo the
> release with JDK6.
> There is a few minor commits on trunk, you can pickup as well.
>
> Is there some way in Maven release plugin or similar to have a way for
> it to fail if not using a specific JDK. Then we could have this
> validated for future. As I assume this can happen again.
>
> Adding a note to the release guide may also help about checking that
> the right JDK version is used.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Christian Müller
> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Today morning I realized I build the Camel 2.11.0 release with Java 7.
> > Because we didn't drop the support for Java 6 with 2.11.0, I consider to
> > cancel this vote again and build a new release today evening.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Christian Müller <
> > christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
> >> apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
> >> It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
> >> fixes [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
> >>
> >> Please find the staging repo here:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
> >>
> >> The tarballs are here
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
> >>
> >> Tag:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
> >>
> >> Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
> >> binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
> vote
> >> counts!
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
> >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Christian
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>
--
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
Hi
I think your build of yesterday should be O.K. even if you used JDK 1.7
for the build as we instruct the maven-compiler-plugin to make use of
${jdk.version} (which is 1.6) both for the source as well as the target:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/pom.xml
And you could easily verify this by running one of the distribution
examples we have inside the tarballs using JDK 1.6 to see if they run well
using JDK 1.6.
Another easy way to verify this is to check that the class files major
version is 50 (in Java 7 it would be 51), e.g. on my workspace it's 50
EVEN IF I use JDK 1.7 for the build (because of the reason described
above):
~/dev/workspace/camel/camel-core/target/classes>javap -verbose
org.apache.camel.Route
Compiled from "Route.java"
public interface org.apache.camel.Route
SourceFile: "Route.java"
minor version: 0
major version: 50
Constant pool:
const #1 = class #42; // org/apache/camel/Route
const #2 = class #43; // java/lang/Object
const #3 = Asciz ID_PROPERTY;
const #4 = Asciz Ljava/lang/String;;
const #5 = Asciz ConstantValue;
const #6 = String #44; // id
const #7 = Asciz PARENT_PROPERTY;
const #8 = String #45; // parent
That all said to make it 100% x 100% sure, yes you could initiate another
build.
Babak
Am 10.04.13 09:29 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" unter <cl...@gmail.com>:
>Hi
>
>Yeah this early in the VOTE it could IMHO be a good idea to redo the
>release with JDK6.
>There is a few minor commits on trunk, you can pickup as well.
>
>Is there some way in Maven release plugin or similar to have a way for
>it to fail if not using a specific JDK. Then we could have this
>validated for future. As I assume this can happen again.
>
>Adding a note to the release guide may also help about checking that
>the right JDK version is used.
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Christian Müller
><ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Today morning I realized I build the Camel 2.11.0 release with Java 7.
>> Because we didn't drop the support for Java 6 with 2.11.0, I consider to
>> cancel this vote again and build a new release today evening.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Christian Müller <
>> christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
>>> apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
>>> It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
>>> fixes [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>>>
>>> Please find the staging repo here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>>>
>>> The tarballs are here
>>>
>>>
>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/or
>>>g/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>>>
>>> Tag:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>>>
>>> Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
>>> binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
>>>vote
>>> counts!
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%2
>>>0fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
>>> [2]
>>>
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231121
>>>1&version=12321695
>>>
>
>
>
>--
>Claus Ibsen
>-----------------
>Red Hat, Inc.
>FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>Web: http://fusesource.com
>Twitter: davsclaus
>Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Yeah this early in the VOTE it could IMHO be a good idea to redo the
release with JDK6.
There is a few minor commits on trunk, you can pickup as well.
Is there some way in Maven release plugin or similar to have a way for
it to fail if not using a specific JDK. Then we could have this
validated for future. As I assume this can happen again.
Adding a note to the release guide may also help about checking that
the right JDK version is used.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Christian Müller
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today morning I realized I build the Camel 2.11.0 release with Java 7.
> Because we didn't drop the support for Java 6 with 2.11.0, I consider to
> cancel this vote again and build a new release today evening.
>
> Comments?
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Christian Müller <
> christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
>> apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
>> It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
>> fixes [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>>
>> Please find the staging repo here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>>
>> The tarballs are here
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>>
>> Tag:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>>
>> Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
>> binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your vote
>> counts!
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Christian
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
>> [2]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
Today morning I realized I build the Camel 2.11.0 release with Java 7.
Because we didn't drop the support for Java 6 with 2.11.0, I consider to
cancel this vote again and build a new release today evening.
Comments?
Regards,
Christian
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Christian Müller <
christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
> After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
> apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
> It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
> fixes [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>
> Please find the staging repo here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>
> The tarballs are here
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>
> Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
> binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your vote
> counts!
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Christian
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
And also the links of TOC don't work by the staging repo version, e.g. click
on:
Introduction...............................................................................................................
23
Nothing happens, in contrast to the one from my box where it JUMPS to the
Introduction page as soon as you click on it.
Babak
Babak Vahdat wrote
> The PDF is readable but TOC is scattered through 21 pages! See the pages
> 2…22
>
> As well look at the formatting of the page 23.
>
> For a better comparison for you this is the one from the staging repo:
> camel-manual-2.11.0.pdf
> <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5730650/camel-manual-2.11.0.pdf>
>
> And the one from my box:
> camel-manual-2.12-SNAPSHOT.pdf
> <http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5730650/camel-manual-2.12-SNAPSHOT.pdf>
>
> Babak
> Christian Mueller wrote
>> I can check my price version later. What do you exactlymean with
>> "corrup"?
>> Can you open the PDF (I can)? Formatting issues?
>>
>> I can redo the release later today...
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Babak Vahdat
>> <
>> babak.vahdat@
>> >wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> sorry for the noise again but the PDF manual still seems to be corrupt!
>>> The
>>> generated PDF on my box seems much better. Which version do you have?
>>> I've
>>> got the following:
>>>
>>> ~/dev/prince>prince --version
>>> Prince 8.0
>>> Copyright 2002-2011 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
>>> Non-commercial License
>>>
>>> Babak
>>>
>>>
>>> Christian Mueller wrote
>>> > After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
>>> > apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
>>> > It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
>>> > fixes
>>> > [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>>> >
>>> > Please find the staging repo here:
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>>> >
>>> > The tarballs are here
>>> >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>>> >
>>> > Tag:
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>>> >
>>> > Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
>>> > binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
>>> > vote
>>> > counts!
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
>>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>>> > Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks in advance,
>>> > Christian
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
>>> > [2]
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730637.html
>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730652.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
The PDF is readable but TOC is scattered through 21 pages! See the pages 2…22
As well look at the formatting of the page 23.
For a better comparison for you this is the one from the staging repo:
camel-manual-2.11.0.pdf
<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5730650/camel-manual-2.11.0.pdf>
And the one from my box: camel-manual-2.12-SNAPSHOT.pdf
<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/file/n5730650/camel-manual-2.12-SNAPSHOT.pdf>
Babak
Christian Mueller wrote
> I can check my price version later. What do you exactlymean with "corrup"?
> Can you open the PDF (I can)? Formatting issues?
>
> I can redo the release later today...
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Babak Vahdat
> <
> babak.vahdat@
> >wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> sorry for the noise again but the PDF manual still seems to be corrupt!
>> The
>> generated PDF on my box seems much better. Which version do you have?
>> I've
>> got the following:
>>
>> ~/dev/prince>prince --version
>> Prince 8.0
>> Copyright 2002-2011 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
>> Non-commercial License
>>
>> Babak
>>
>>
>> Christian Mueller wrote
>> > After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
>> > apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
>> > It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
>> > fixes
>> > [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>> >
>> > Please find the staging repo here:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>> >
>> > The tarballs are here
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>> >
>> > Tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>> >
>> > Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
>> > binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
>> > vote
>> > counts!
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
>> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>> > Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Christian
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
>> > [2]
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730637.html
>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730650.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
I can check my price version later. What do you exactlymean with "corrup"?
Can you open the PDF (I can)? Formatting issues?
I can redo the release later today...
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Babak Vahdat
<ba...@swissonline.ch>wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> sorry for the noise again but the PDF manual still seems to be corrupt! The
> generated PDF on my box seems much better. Which version do you have? I've
> got the following:
>
> ~/dev/prince>prince --version
> Prince 8.0
> Copyright 2002-2011 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
> Non-commercial License
>
> Babak
>
>
> Christian Mueller wrote
> > After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
> > apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
> > It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
> > fixes
> > [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
> >
> > Please find the staging repo here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
> >
> > The tarballs are here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
> >
> > Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
> > binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
> > vote
> > counts!
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Christian
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
> > [2]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730637.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
At present I'm using:
cmueller$ /usr/local/lib/prince/bin/prince --version
Prince 8.1 rev 5
Copyright 2002-2013 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
Non-commercial License
Will downgrade and build again. If it works, I will cancel this this vote
and start a new build...
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Babak Vahdat
<ba...@swissonline.ch>wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> sorry for the noise again but the PDF manual still seems to be corrupt! The
> generated PDF on my box seems much better. Which version do you have? I've
> got the following:
>
> ~/dev/prince>prince --version
> Prince 8.0
> Copyright 2002-2011 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
> Non-commercial License
>
> Babak
>
>
> Christian Mueller wrote
> > After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
> > apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
> > It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
> > fixes
> > [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
> >
> > Please find the staging repo here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
> >
> > The tarballs are here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
> >
> > Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
> > binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
> > vote
> > counts!
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> > Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Christian
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
> > [2]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730637.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.11.0 (take 2)
Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.
Hi Christian,
sorry for the noise again but the PDF manual still seems to be corrupt! The
generated PDF on my box seems much better. Which version do you have? I've
got the following:
~/dev/prince>prince --version
Prince 8.0
Copyright 2002-2011 YesLogic Pty. Ltd.
Non-commercial License
Babak
Christian Mueller wrote
> After 9 month of development, we have a new minor release candidate
> apache-camel-2.11.0 ready.
> It comes with 656 issues resolved: new features, improvements and bug
> fixes
> [1]. You can find the release notes here [2].
>
> Please find the staging repo here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/
>
> The tarballs are here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-082/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.11.0/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/tags/camel-2.11.0/
>
> Please review, help out with testing and vote to approve this release
> binary. Please mention what you tested to prevent duplicate work. Your
> vote
> counts!
>
> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.11.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Christian
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CAMEL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.11.0%22
> [2]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12321695
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-0-take-2-tp5730599p5730637.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.