You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> on 2007/11/04 14:43:12 UTC
[VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Hi all,
I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
tested:
* Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
* Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
* Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
and here you can find the maven repo:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
[ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
[ ] Don't release, because...
Regards
Frank
[1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
[2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
Ate
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
[ x ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
[ ] Don't release, because...
Eelco
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Gerolf Seitz <ge...@gmail.com>.
>
> [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
>
Gerolf
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>.
[X] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
On Nov 4, 2007 3:27 PM, jweekend <jw...@cabouge.com> wrote:
>
> 1.3.0-rc1; that has a very pleasant ring to it, congratulations!
> I was still expecting beta5, so this is a nice surprise.
> Regards - Cemal
> http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
>
>
>
> Frank Bille-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> > tested:
> >
> > * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test
> failures.
> > * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> > * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images,
> forms,
> > guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
> >
> > The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> > KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
> >
> > Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
> > <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> >
> >
> > and here you can find the maven repo:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/
> >
> >
> > and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> >
> > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> > [ ] Don't release, because...
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> > [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Wicket-1.3.0-release-candidate-1-tf4746696.html#a13575576
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Bruno Borges
blog.brunoborges.com.br
+55 1185657739
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by jweekend <jw...@cabouge.com>.
1.3.0-rc1; that has a very pleasant ring to it, congratulations!
I was still expecting beta5, so this is a nice surprise.
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
Frank Bille-2 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> tested:
>
> * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
> * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
>
> The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
>
> Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
>
> and here you can find the maven repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
>
> and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Regards
> Frank
>
>
> [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Wicket-1.3.0-release-candidate-1-tf4746696.html#a13575576
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
Hmm, thats weird. I have built on linux and as you know the
release.shrequires a mvn and mvn4 (
1.4). Så it should have been build and tested using the correct jre's.
Can anyone shed some light on this failing test? I can't (apparantly)
reproduce it.
Frank
On Nov 5, 2007 10:49 PM, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've taken some time to test the release, but I get the following test
> failure on OS X, Java 4:
>
> [surefire] Running org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.ImageTest
> [surefire] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.037
> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>
> So that would be a -1?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +0 (I don't have the time to test the release, but don't want to hold it
> back).
> >
> > The release does have your signature, so that's cool (just need to
> > verify you are actually you).
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 11/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> > > tested:
> > >
> > > * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test
> failures.
> > > * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> > > * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images,
> forms,
> > > guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
> > >
> > > The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in
> the
> > > KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
> > >
> > > Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
> > > <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> >
> > >
> > > and here you can find the maven repo:
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/
> >
> > >
> > > and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> > >
> > > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> > > [ ] Don't release, because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> > > [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On Nov 7, 2007 6:14 PM, Gwyn Evans <gw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07 November 2007, 3:48:47 PM, Al Maw wrote: AM> Frank Bille wrote:
> >> No problem. When I release it will be tested. Both the compile,
> unit test >> and manual testing. And then we will convince Martijn to
> also test it on his >> OSX. when I call for a vote again.
>
> AM> FWIW, the branch now has 100% passing tests on my OS X box.
>
> Also here on WinXP.
>
Thanks guys :-)
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Gwyn Evans <gw...@gmail.com>.
On 07 November 2007, 3:48:47 PM, Al Maw wrote: AM> Frank Bille wrote:
>> No problem. When I release it will be tested. Both the compile,
unit test >> and manual testing. And then we will convince Martijn to
also test it on his >> OSX. when I call for a vote again.
AM> FWIW, the branch now has 100% passing tests on my OS X box.
Also here on WinXP.
--
/Gwyn
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com>.
Frank Bille wrote:
> No problem. When I release it will be tested. Both the compile, unit test
> and manual testing. And then we will convince Martijn to also test it on his
> OSX. when I call for a vote again.
FWIW, the branch now has 100% passing tests on my OS X box.
Regards,
Al
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
No problem. When I release it will be tested. Both the compile, unit test
and manual testing. And then we will convince Martijn to also test it on his
OSX. when I call for a vote again.
Frank
On Nov 7, 2007 4:02 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the problem is that i just checked out wicket part and not the complete
> tree
> and then uses svn merge revision x to y. It seems to work fine but as i
> couldn't really test it
> (didn't compile/build because i couldn't generate the right project and
> classpath files)
>
> johan
>
>
>
>
> On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2007 3:30 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > i applied just the unit test patch to that rc1 tag.
> > > Can you test it?
> > >
> >
> >
> > I will test it when I build the release tonight at around 7PM GM+2. But
> I
> > expect it to work if it's the same as you did on trunk :-)
> >
> > Thank you
> > Frank
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
the problem is that i just checked out wicket part and not the complete tree
and then uses svn merge revision x to y. It seems to work fine but as i
couldn't really test it
(didn't compile/build because i couldn't generate the right project and
classpath files)
johan
On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 3:30 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > i applied just the unit test patch to that rc1 tag.
> > Can you test it?
> >
>
>
> I will test it when I build the release tonight at around 7PM GM+2. But I
> expect it to work if it's the same as you did on trunk :-)
>
> Thank you
> Frank
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On Nov 7, 2007 3:30 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i applied just the unit test patch to that rc1 tag.
> Can you test it?
>
I will test it when I build the release tonight at around 7PM GM+2. But I
expect it to work if it's the same as you did on trunk :-)
Thank you
Frank
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
i applied just the unit test patch to that rc1 tag.
Can you test it?
johan
On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That would be much easier for me, if you do that. Then I only have to
> update
> my local checkout of the RC1 and run the release again.
>
> Let me know what you do :-)
>
> Frank
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 12:53 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > i can try to patch the RC1 tag if that is easier. and then just the
> image
> > test.
> > people shouldnt redeploy then (when developing) or use it in production.
> >
> > On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Well, I could do it from head again and just restart it totally. Would
> > it
> > > then be fair to say that all issues said to be fixed for rc2 should
> set
> > to
> > > fixed for rc1?
> > >
> > > I'll do it tonight around 7pm GMT+2
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 6, 2007 12:13 AM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ok so what are we going to do?
> > > > rebuild?
> > > > From head or do you want to patch a branch? (ugh...)
> > > >
> > > > Because if we make new one then also take the RequestContext fix
> with
> > it.
> > > >
> > > > johan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/5/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me
> > that
> > > > > > the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate
> > with
> > > > > > a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures
> > don't
> > > > > > occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> > > > > > rebuild the release with the patch in.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release
> > branch.
> > > > > > The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
That would be much easier for me, if you do that. Then I only have to update
my local checkout of the RC1 and run the release again.
Let me know what you do :-)
Frank
On Nov 7, 2007 12:53 PM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i can try to patch the RC1 tag if that is easier. and then just the image
> test.
> people shouldnt redeploy then (when developing) or use it in production.
>
> On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Well, I could do it from head again and just restart it totally. Would
> it
> > then be fair to say that all issues said to be fixed for rc2 should set
> to
> > fixed for rc1?
> >
> > I'll do it tonight around 7pm GMT+2
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2007 12:13 AM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ok so what are we going to do?
> > > rebuild?
> > > From head or do you want to patch a branch? (ugh...)
> > >
> > > Because if we make new one then also take the RequestContext fix with
> it.
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/5/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me
> that
> > > > > the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate
> with
> > > > > a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures
> don't
> > > > > occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> > > > > rebuild the release with the patch in.
> > > > >
> > > > > The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release
> branch.
> > > > > The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree.
> > > >
> > > > But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
> > > >
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
i can try to patch the RC1 tag if that is easier. and then just the image test.
people shouldnt redeploy then (when developing) or use it in production.
On 11/7/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Well, I could do it from head again and just restart it totally. Would it
> then be fair to say that all issues said to be fixed for rc2 should set to
> fixed for rc1?
>
> I'll do it tonight around 7pm GMT+2
>
> Frank
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2007 12:13 AM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ok so what are we going to do?
> > rebuild?
> > From head or do you want to patch a branch? (ugh...)
> >
> > Because if we make new one then also take the RequestContext fix with it.
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/5/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me that
> > > > the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
> > > >
> > > > I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate with
> > > > a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures don't
> > > > occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> > > > rebuild the release with the patch in.
> > > >
> > > > The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release branch.
> > > > The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > > But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
Well, I could do it from head again and just restart it totally. Would it
then be fair to say that all issues said to be fixed for rc2 should set to
fixed for rc1?
I'll do it tonight around 7pm GMT+2
Frank
On Nov 6, 2007 12:13 AM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok so what are we going to do?
> rebuild?
> From head or do you want to patch a branch? (ugh...)
>
> Because if we make new one then also take the RequestContext fix with it.
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On 11/5/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me that
> > > the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
> > >
> > > I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate with
> > > a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures don't
> > > occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> > > rebuild the release with the patch in.
> > >
> > > The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release branch.
> > > The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
> > >
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
> >
> > Frank
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
ok so what are we going to do?
rebuild?
>From head or do you want to patch a branch? (ugh...)
Because if we make new one then also take the RequestContext fix with it.
johan
On 11/5/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me that
> > the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
> >
> > I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate with
> > a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures don't
> > occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> > rebuild the release with the patch in.
> >
> > The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release branch.
> > The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
> >
>
> I agree.
>
> But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
>
> Frank
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me that
> the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
>
> I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate with
> a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures don't
> occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
> rebuild the release with the patch in.
>
> The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release branch.
> The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
>
I agree.
But I don't have time tomorrow to do it, so it will be Wednesday.
Frank
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Johan has fixed the code and the tests. However, he assured me that
the test failure shouldn't cause problems in application code.
I'm changing my vote to -1. I think shipping a release candidate with
a test failure gives the wrong impression. Though the failures don't
occur on most machines, I think we should take the high road and
rebuild the release with the patch in.
The patch can be taken from head and applied to the release branch.
The release can then be recreated and the vote restarted.
Martijn
On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've taken some time to test the release, but I get the following test
> failure on OS X, Java 4:
>
> [surefire] Running org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.ImageTest
> [surefire] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.037
> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>
> So that would be a -1?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +0 (I don't have the time to test the release, but don't want to hold it back).
> >
> > The release does have your signature, so that's cool (just need to
> > verify you are actually you).
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 11/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> > > tested:
> > >
> > > * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
> > > * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> > > * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> > > guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
> > >
> > > The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> > > KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
> > >
> > > Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
> > >
> > > and here you can find the maven repo:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
> > >
> > > and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> > >
> > > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> > > [ ] Don't release, because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> > > [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
I've taken some time to test the release, but I get the following test
failure on OS X, Java 4:
[surefire] Running org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.ImageTest
[surefire] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.037
sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
So that would be a -1?
Martijn
On 11/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +0 (I don't have the time to test the release, but don't want to hold it back).
>
> The release does have your signature, so that's cool (just need to
> verify you are actually you).
>
> Martijn
>
> On 11/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> > tested:
> >
> > * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
> > * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> > * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> > guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
> >
> > The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> > KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
> >
> > Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
> >
> > and here you can find the maven repo:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
> >
> > and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> > http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
> >
> > [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> > [ ] Don't release, because...
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> > [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
+0 (I don't have the time to test the release, but don't want to hold it back).
The release does have your signature, so that's cool (just need to
verify you are actually you).
Martijn
On 11/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> tested:
>
> * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
> * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
>
> The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
>
> Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
>
> and here you can find the maven repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
>
> and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Regards
> Frank
>
>
> [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org>.
I cancel this vote, because of bugs found. I will restart it tonight when I
have created a new release.
Thank you all for participating.
Frank
On Nov 4, 2007 2:43 PM, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> tested:
>
> * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
>
> * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
>
> The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
>
> Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/>
>
> and here you can find the maven repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/>
>
> and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Regards
> Frank
>
>
> [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
looks good
[X] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
On 11/4/07, Frank Bille <fr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have uploaded the artifacts to my p.a.o account. This is what I have
> tested:
>
> * Run "mvn clean install" on the distribution. Installs, no test failures.
> * Run RAT[1] on the release and checked the output. Nothing to notice.
> * Tried different things in the examples, like ajax, links, images, forms,
> guice and pub2. Nothing to notice.
>
> The releases has been signed with my GPG key, which you can find in the
> KEYS[2] file. It's still not signed by anyone (lazy me)
>
> Anyway, here you can find the distribution files:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/dist/
> >
>
> and here you can find the maven repo:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/m2-repo/
> >
>
> and here I have uploaded the RAT logs:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Efrankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.3.0-rc1/>
>
> [ ] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
>
> Regards
> Frank
>
>
> [1]: http://code.google.com/p/arat/
> [2]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/KEYS
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com>.
Even so, it's better to have a RC-2 than Beta-6 :) (beta5 -> rc1)
The community trusts more on release candidates than betas. :D
On Nov 5, 2007 10:51 AM, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> really, do you think?
> i am pretty confident that rc1 can be promoted to GA :)
>
> johan
>
>
>
> On 11/5/07, Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com> wrote:
> >
> > [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
> >
> > Yeah, go for it.
> > It's a little bit disingenuous, because I'm sure we'll need an rc2
> > before we get a final release out, but hey. ;-)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Al
> >
>
--
Bruno Borges
blog.brunoborges.com.br
+55 1185657739
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
really, do you think?
i am pretty confident that rc1 can be promoted to GA :)
johan
On 11/5/07, Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com> wrote:
>
> [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
>
> Yeah, go for it.
> It's a little bit disingenuous, because I'm sure we'll need an rc2
> before we get a final release out, but hey. ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Al
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Al Maw <wi...@almaw.com>.
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
Yeah, go for it.
It's a little bit disingenuous, because I'm sure we'll need an rc2
before we get a final release out, but hey. ;-)
Regards,
Al
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Evan Chooly <ev...@gmail.com>.
DO IT, DOUG!!!
On 11/4/07, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
>
> -igor
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Wicket 1.3.0 release candidate 1
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-rc1
-igor