You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@lucene.apache.org by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> on 2010/04/12 05:50:50 UTC
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
+1 (on trust, really)
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-015/
>
> contains (this time for sure) all the artifacts for release 1.0 of the
> mahout-collections component. This is the first independent release of
> collections from the rest of mahout; it differs from the version
> released with mahout 0.3 only in removing a dependency on slf4j.
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:29 AM, deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 (on trust, really)
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-015/
> >>
> >> contains (this time for sure) all the artifacts for release 1.0 of the
> >> mahout-collections component. This is the first independent release of
> >> collections from the rest of mahout; it differs from the version
> >> released with mahout 0.3 only in removing a dependency on slf4j.
> >>
> >> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by deneche abdelhakim <ad...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (on trust, really)
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-015/
>>
>> contains (this time for sure) all the artifacts for release 1.0 of the
>> mahout-collections component. This is the first independent release of
>> collections from the rest of mahout; it differs from the version
>> released with mahout 0.3 only in removing a dependency on slf4j.
>>
>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
OK. Noted.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> > But we are talking about releasing a component that is not used yet.
> That
> > means that the down-side to the release is essentially nil.
>
> There are legal ramifications to doing a release that need to be validated
> by the PMC.
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (on trust, really)
>>
>> Not to pick on Ted here, but this is not something you should do. If you
>> don't have time to download and verify the artifacts, please don't vote, as
>> the vote is meaningless at best. No vote is better than an unverified vote.
>>
>> -Grant
>
>
> I agree.
>
> But we are talking about releasing a component that is not used yet. That
> means that the down-side to the release is essentially nil.
There are legal ramifications to doing a release that need to be validated by the PMC.
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Apache Policy/Folklore:
When voting for a release, you are supposed to download the source,
build it, and verify that it is more or less as advertised. In this
case, observing that typing 'mvn' at the downloaded source builds and
passes unit tests is about as good as it's going to get.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (on trust, really)
>>
>> Not to pick on Ted here, but this is not something you should do. If you
>> don't have time to download and verify the artifacts, please don't vote, as
>> the vote is meaningless at best. No vote is better than an unverified vote.
>>
>> -Grant
>
>
> I agree.
>
> But we are talking about releasing a component that is not used yet. That
> means that the down-side to the release is essentially nil.
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > +1 (on trust, really)
>
> Not to pick on Ted here, but this is not something you should do. If you
> don't have time to download and verify the artifacts, please don't vote, as
> the vote is meaningless at best. No vote is better than an unverified vote.
>
> -Grant
I agree.
But we are talking about releasing a component that is not used yet. That
means that the down-side to the release is essentially nil.
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 (on trust, really)
Not to pick on Ted here, but this is not something you should do. If you don't have time to download and verify the artifacts, please don't vote, as the vote is meaningless at best. No vote is better than an unverified vote.
-Grant
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Apr 11, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> +1 (on trust, really)
Not to pick on Ted here, but this is not something you should do. If you don't have time to download and verify the artifacts, please don't vote, as the vote is meaningless at best. No vote is better than an unverified vote.
-Grant
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Unlike the last one, you don't have to take this one on trust, not
that I'm complaining. It is possible to download source, but, and run
unit tests in the more or less usual way if anyone is so inclined.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure +1 for same reason.
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 (on trust, really)
>
Re: VOTE: take 2: mahout-collections-1.0
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Sure +1 for same reason.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (on trust, really)