You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/11 16:08:59 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CASSANDRA-1954) Double-check or replace RRW memtable lock

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jonathan Ellis resolved CASSANDRA-1954.
---------------------------------------

       Resolution: Later
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.0)
         Assignee:     (was: Sylvain Lebresne)

> Double-check or replace RRW memtable lock
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Stu Hood
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-Double-check-in-maybeSwitchMemtable-to-minimize-writeL.txt, 0001-Remove-flusherLock-readLock.patch, 1954-0.7-v2.txt, 1954-v2.txt, 1954_trunk.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 8h
>  Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> {quote}...when a Memtable reaches its threshold, up to (all) N write threads will often notice, and race to acquire the writeLock in order to freeze the memtable. This means that we do way more writeLock acquisitions than we need to...{quote}
> See CASSANDRA-1930 for backstory, but adding double checking inside a read lock before trying to re-entrantly acquire the writelock would eliminate most of these excess writelock acquisitions.
> Alternatively, we should explore removing locking from these structures entirely, and replacing the writeLock acquisition with a per-memtable counter of active threads.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira