You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/11 16:08:59 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (CASSANDRA-1954) Double-check or replace RRW
memtable lock
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jonathan Ellis resolved CASSANDRA-1954.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Later
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0)
Assignee: (was: Sylvain Lebresne)
> Double-check or replace RRW memtable lock
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1954
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1954
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Stu Hood
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 0001-Double-check-in-maybeSwitchMemtable-to-minimize-writeL.txt, 0001-Remove-flusherLock-readLock.patch, 1954-0.7-v2.txt, 1954-v2.txt, 1954_trunk.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 8h
> Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> {quote}...when a Memtable reaches its threshold, up to (all) N write threads will often notice, and race to acquire the writeLock in order to freeze the memtable. This means that we do way more writeLock acquisitions than we need to...{quote}
> See CASSANDRA-1930 for backstory, but adding double checking inside a read lock before trying to re-entrantly acquire the writelock would eliminate most of these excess writelock acquisitions.
> Alternatively, we should explore removing locking from these structures entirely, and replacing the writeLock acquisition with a per-memtable counter of active threads.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira