You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/10/13 13:34:45 UTC

[GitHub] [plc4x] chrisdutz commented on pull request #545: feat(plc4go): Implementing the correct reading of BOOL types

chrisdutz commented on PR #545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/pull/545#issuecomment-1277625494

   Guess I'll have to fully review this next week (Currently travelling) ... also would I like to continue the discussion on the list on if my proposal even makes sense ... cause I think we never finished that discussion. I probably should have marked that document as Work In Progress.
   Thing is ... I think the general notation used in many places would have more been something like BOOL[5..10] or so ...


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@plc4x.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org