Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct

[Bkrm Adhikari <bi...@gmail.com>]

Yes sure i...do

Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:

>
>
>On 06/30/2015 07:23 AM, jan i wrote:
>> Maybe I am a bad reader, but I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and
>> surely apache big data
>> (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by LF. I
>> would like to see it "applied to"
>> and not only "expect to be honered" for  all apache events including
>> apacheCON.
>
>
>LF has a code of conduct. It's shorter than ours, and probably more 
>easily enforceable because it covers a very limited time and space, 
>whereas ours covers the known universe and all time.
>
>If someone behaves badly at ApacheCon, we (actually, LF) can throw them 
>out the door and ask them not to come back next time.
>
>If someone behaves badly at the ASF, how do we enforce? This is yet to 
>be determined.
>
>If you wish to apply our CoC to ApacheCon, we need to be very clear with 
>LF as to what that means, specifically, and we also need to take 
>responsibility for that enforcement. As it stands now, we rely on LF to 
>enforce their CoC, when we report incidents to them. I'm not actually 
>sure we want to take that over from them, but it's certainly worth 
>discussing.
>
>
>-- 
>Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
>http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon