You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Peter Van Biesen <pe...@vlafo.be> on 2002/08/23 10:18:38 UTC
Request for change
Hello,
frequently I get error messages like :
[Fri Aug 23 10:00:34 2002] [error] [client 193.53.20.96] no acceptable
variant: /opt/httpd/error/HTTP_NOT_FOUND.html.var, refe[etc]
Would it be possible to include in the logmessage wich variant it is
looking for ?
Thank you !
Peter Van Biesen
System Administrator VFSIPH
Re: Request for change
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
Peter Van Biesen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> frequently I get error messages like :
>
> [Fri Aug 23 10:00:34 2002] [error] [client 193.53.20.96] no acceptable
> variant: /opt/httpd/error/HTTP_NOT_FOUND.html.var, refe[etc]
>
> Would it be possible to include in the logmessage wich variant it is
> looking for ?
That might be a little complicated because the negotiation can be along
several dimensions. If you know that language is the problem, you can
log the Accept-Language header in the access log. And you can eliminate
this error entirely by imposing your own judgement using the
ForceLanguagePriority directive.
Joshua.
What variant is not found??? [Was: Request for change]
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 03:18 AM 8/23/2002, Peter Van Biesen wrote:
>Hello,
>
>frequently I get error messages like :
>
>[Fri Aug 23 10:00:34 2002] [error] [client 193.53.20.96] no acceptable
>variant: /opt/httpd/error/HTTP_NOT_FOUND.html.var, refe[etc]
>
>Would it be possible to include in the logmessage wich variant it is
>looking for ?
Sounds like a very worthwhile option, although it should probably be
an option so that we don't fill up error logs with what some admins
will consider extra cruft.