You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Olav Sandstaa <Ol...@Sun.COM> on 2007/07/03 10:19:18 UTC
10.3.1.0 beta performance
I have run some simple performance tests comparing the 10.3.1.0 beta
build against 10.2.2.0 to check the effect of the various performance
improvements that have gone into 10.3. The first test measure the
throughput of reading a random record from a table while the second test
runs "TPC-B like" load (each transaction consists of three updates, one
insert, and one select). The from these tests are attached.
As the graphs show, 10.3 contains large improvements in the performance,
particularly for read-only load. For reading random records 10.3 has
more than 3 times the performance of 10.2 (on this test configuration)
when there are concurrent clients. Great work!!
The tests were run on a dual AMD Opteron machine running Solaris 10 and
JDK 6.
Some more performance data comparing 10.3 to 10.2.2 can be found here:
http://home.online.no/~olmsan/derby/perf/
This page shows the results from a daily run of trunk and compares the
performance using 10.2.2. as baseline.
Olav
Re: 10.3.1.0 beta performance
Posted by Olav Sandstaa <Ol...@Sun.COM>.
In case someone is interested in how these performance numbers for Derby
10.3 compare to other open-source databases, have a look at the last
four slides in the following presentation:
http://home.online.no/~olmsan/publications/pres/jazoon07/JavaDbJazoon07.pdf
Olav
Olav Sandstaa wrote:
> I have run some simple performance tests comparing the 10.3.1.0 beta
> build against 10.2.2.0 to check the effect of the various performance
> improvements that have gone into 10.3. The first test measure the
> throughput of reading a random record from a table while the second
> test runs "TPC-B like" load (each transaction consists of three
> updates, one insert, and one select). The from these tests are attached.
>
> As the graphs show, 10.3 contains large improvements in the
> performance, particularly for read-only load. For reading random
> records 10.3 has more than 3 times the performance of 10.2 (on this
> test configuration) when there are concurrent clients. Great work!!
>
> The tests were run on a dual AMD Opteron machine running Solaris 10
> and JDK 6.
>
> Some more performance data comparing 10.3 to 10.2.2 can be found here:
>
> http://home.online.no/~olmsan/derby/perf/
>
> This page shows the results from a daily run of trunk and compares
> the performance using 10.2.2. as baseline.
>
> Olav
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>