You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by Jie Yu <yu...@gmail.com> on 2014/06/18 20:45:06 UTC

Review Request 22749: Allowed launching subprocesses with flags.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.


Repository: mesos-git


Description
-------

See summary. This patch only updated references in libprocess.


Diffs
-----

  3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp e93608a 
  3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp 78fa1ec 
  3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp 1cb1ce3 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/diff/


Testing
-------

make check


Thanks,

Jie Yu


Re: Review Request 22749: Allowed launching subprocesses with flags.

Posted by Jie Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.

> On June 18, 2014, 6:59 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > 3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp, lines 230-231
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/diff/1/?file=612456#file612456line230>
> >
> >     The long term solution here is probably to have an array of strings and use a different exec variant. Maybe for the flags case we can assume that 'command' is really 'argv0'? Perhaps suggest this in the TODO so one can circle back.

Added TODO.


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/#review46109
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 18, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 18, 2014, 6:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary. This patch only updated references in libprocess.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp e93608a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp 78fa1ec 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp 1cb1ce3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>


Re: Review Request 22749: Allowed launching subprocesses with flags.

Posted by Benjamin Hindman <be...@berkeley.edu>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/#review46109
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks good. I think we might want more overloads at some point that lets us mix and match flags, stdin, stderr, stdout, etc, but we can do that later.


3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/#comment81276>

    The long term solution here is probably to have an array of strings and use a different exec variant. Maybe for the flags case we can assume that 'command' is really 'argv0'? Perhaps suggest this in the TODO so one can circle back.


- Benjamin Hindman


On June 18, 2014, 6:45 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 18, 2014, 6:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary. This patch only updated references in libprocess.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/subprocess.hpp e93608a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/subprocess.cpp 78fa1ec 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/subprocess_tests.cpp 1cb1ce3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22749/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>