You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com> on 2009/03/05 21:44:28 UTC
Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Hi Carl,
The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
Anyone else given this a try? I'd like to merge this to trunk
shortly...
Thanks,
-Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
> Steve Huston wrote:
>> Hi Aidan,
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
>>>> resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
>>>> build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
>>>>
>>> FWIW it passed make check and java test -Dprofile=cpp for me on x86
>>> Fedora 10.
>>>
>>
>> Great, thanks for that test. I've also been testing it on RHEL 5.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>>
>
> RHEL4 is the most picky, which would be one to check
make check and make check-long pass on RHEL 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
Steve Huston wrote:
> Hi Aidan,
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Steve Huston
>> <sh...@riverace.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
>>> resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
>>> build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
>>>
>> FWIW it passed make check and java test -Dprofile=cpp for me
>> on x86 Fedora 10.
>>
>
> Great, thanks for that test. I've also been testing it on RHEL 5.
>
> -Steve
>
>
RHEL4 is the most picky, which would be one to check
Carl.
RE: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>.
Hi Aidan,
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Steve Huston
> <sh...@riverace.com> wrote:
>
> > The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
> > resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
> > build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
>
> FWIW it passed make check and java test -Dprofile=cpp for me
> on x86 Fedora 10.
Great, thanks for that test. I've also been testing it on RHEL 5.
-Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Aidan Skinner <ai...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com> wrote:
> The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
> resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
> build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
FWIW it passed make check and java test -Dprofile=cpp for me on x86 Fedora 10.
- Aidan
--
Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
http://qpid.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
RE: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Steve Huston <sh...@riverace.com>.
Hi Danushka,
I had a lot of problems with BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK initially, so I
removed it. Now that more issues are resolved, I'll try adding it back
in.
FWIW, I ran the examples and such and didn't see any of the crashes
that Shan did.
-Steve
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Check out my networked programming blog at
http://stevehuston.wordpress.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danushka Menikkumbura [mailto:danushka@wso2.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:16 AM
> To: dev@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
>
>
>
> > The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
> > resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
> > build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
> >
> > Anyone else given this a try? I'd like to merge this to trunk
> > shortly...
> >
> Hi Steve,
>
> I am failing to build the DLL's. This is due to libraries
> trying to link
> with non-win32 boost libs. I managed to get them to link with
correct
> boost libs using the BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK preprocessor
> definition and see
> this is missing in all the projects under 1673 branch.
>
> Danushka
>
> --
> Danushka Menikkumbura
> Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
>
> blog : http://danushka-menikkumbura.blogspot.com/
>
> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@wso2.com>.
> The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
> resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
> build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
>
> Anyone else given this a try? I'd like to merge this to trunk
> shortly...
>
Hi Steve,
I am failing to build the DLL's. This is due to libraries trying to link
with non-win32 boost libs. I managed to get them to link with correct
boost libs using the BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK preprocessor definition and see
this is missing in all the projects under 1673 branch.
Danushka
--
Danushka Menikkumbura
Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
blog : http://danushka-menikkumbura.blogspot.com/
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
Re: Experiences with qpid-1673 branch?
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
my bad, I got swamped ... let me look into that now.
Carl.
Steve Huston wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> The other day you mentioned you may be able to point some test
> resources at the qpid-1673 branch (which adds Windows DLLs to the
> build). Have you had an opportunity to do that?
>
> Anyone else given this a try? I'd like to merge this to trunk
> shortly...
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscribe@qpid.apache.org