You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Davide Giannella (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/09 10:37:14 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225:
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.14.0

> Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Alex Deparvu
>            Assignee: Alex Deparvu
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.12.0, 1.14.0
>
>         Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, groupimpl-v2.patch
>
>
> As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members.
> Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup.
> WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise.
> fyi [~anchela]
> [0] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)