You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Joseph Sloan <jj...@c-me.com> on 1997/03/28 00:00:02 UTC
general/278: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
>Number: 278
>Category: general
>Synopsis: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache (Apache HTTP Project)
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 15:00:01 1997
>Originator: jjs@c-me.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release: 1.2.x
>Environment:
Linux 2.0.29, Slackware 96 and RedHat 4.1
>Description:
To my dismay, every version of 1.2 I have compiled and installed turns
out to be 40-50% slower than 1.1.3 - I have been using the Zeusbench
program as a benchmark - whether I use 1 connection or 100 concurrent
connections, small files or large files, 1 request for the file or
several hundred requests, whether I request keep-alive or not, 1.2.x
clocks in 40-50% slower than 1.1.3.
>How-To-Repeat:
Simply download zeusbench from www.zeus.co.uk/products/server
and compare apache 1.1 to 1.2 on any system
>Fix:
Not yet - I'm amazed that nobody's mentioned this earlie
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Re: general/278: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
Posted by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>.
Sorry I've been working with Joseph on this one. My suspicion is that his
benchmarks aren't very accurate -- too many concurrent requests, too few
children, too little time. I'm still waiting for his response.
Dean
On Sun, 6 Apr 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:
> What happens if you add -DNO_LINGCLOSE to the EXTRA_CFLAGS line in your
> Configuration file, rerun Configure and recompile? Does that help?
>
> I do not see the same differences here, but I'm not running on Linux which
> may make a difference.
>
> On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Joseph Sloan wrote:
>
> >
> > >Number: 278
> > >Category: general
> > >Synopsis: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
> > >Confidential: no
> > >Severity: serious
> > >Priority: medium
> > >Responsible: apache (Apache HTTP Project)
> > >State: open
> > >Class: sw-bug
> > >Submitter-Id: apache
> > >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 15:00:01 1997
> > >Originator: jjs@c-me.com
> > >Organization:
> > apache
> > >Release: 1.2.x
> > >Environment:
> > Linux 2.0.29, Slackware 96 and RedHat 4.1
> > >Description:
> > To my dismay, every version of 1.2 I have compiled and installed turns
> > out to be 40-50% slower than 1.1.3 - I have been using the Zeusbench
> > program as a benchmark - whether I use 1 connection or 100 concurrent
> > connections, small files or large files, 1 request for the file or
> > several hundred requests, whether I request keep-alive or not, 1.2.x
> > clocks in 40-50% slower than 1.1.3.
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> > Simply download zeusbench from www.zeus.co.uk/products/server
> > and compare apache 1.1 to 1.2 on any system
> > >Fix:
> > Not yet - I'm amazed that nobody's mentioned this earlie
> > >Audit-Trail:
> > >Unformatted:
> >
> >
>
>
Re: general/278: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>.
What happens if you add -DNO_LINGCLOSE to the EXTRA_CFLAGS line in your
Configuration file, rerun Configure and recompile? Does that help?
I do not see the same differences here, but I'm not running on Linux which
may make a difference.
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Joseph Sloan wrote:
>
> >Number: 278
> >Category: general
> >Synopsis: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: serious
> >Priority: medium
> >Responsible: apache (Apache HTTP Project)
> >State: open
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: apache
> >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 15:00:01 1997
> >Originator: jjs@c-me.com
> >Organization:
> apache
> >Release: 1.2.x
> >Environment:
> Linux 2.0.29, Slackware 96 and RedHat 4.1
> >Description:
> To my dismay, every version of 1.2 I have compiled and installed turns
> out to be 40-50% slower than 1.1.3 - I have been using the Zeusbench
> program as a benchmark - whether I use 1 connection or 100 concurrent
> connections, small files or large files, 1 request for the file or
> several hundred requests, whether I request keep-alive or not, 1.2.x
> clocks in 40-50% slower than 1.1.3.
> >How-To-Repeat:
> Simply download zeusbench from www.zeus.co.uk/products/server
> and compare apache 1.1 to 1.2 on any system
> >Fix:
> Not yet - I'm amazed that nobody's mentioned this earlie
> >Audit-Trail:
> >Unformatted:
>
>
Re: general/278: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
Posted by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>.
Can you provide your Configuration and your configuration files, and the
Configuration you are using for 1.1.3?
Dean
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Joseph Sloan wrote:
>
> >Number: 278
> >Category: general
> >Synopsis: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: serious
> >Priority: medium
> >Responsible: apache (Apache HTTP Project)
> >State: open
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: apache
> >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 15:00:01 1997
> >Originator: jjs@c-me.com
> >Organization:
> apache
> >Release: 1.2.x
> >Environment:
> Linux 2.0.29, Slackware 96 and RedHat 4.1
> >Description:
> To my dismay, every version of 1.2 I have compiled and installed turns
> out to be 40-50% slower than 1.1.3 - I have been using the Zeusbench
> program as a benchmark - whether I use 1 connection or 100 concurrent
> connections, small files or large files, 1 request for the file or
> several hundred requests, whether I request keep-alive or not, 1.2.x
> clocks in 40-50% slower than 1.1.3.
> >How-To-Repeat:
> Simply download zeusbench from www.zeus.co.uk/products/server
> and compare apache 1.1 to 1.2 on any system
> >Fix:
> Not yet - I'm amazed that nobody's mentioned this earlie
> >Audit-Trail:
> >Unformatted:
>
>
>