You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by yl...@apache.org on 2014/03/03 15:54:14 UTC
svn commit: r1573575 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Author: ylavic
Date: Mon Mar 3 14:54:14 2014
New Revision: 1573575
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1573575
Log:
Promote DirectoryCheckHandler.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1573575&r1=1573574&r2=1573575&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Mar 3 14:54:14 2014
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
[ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ]
+
+ * mod_dir: provide a directive to skip mod_dir processing if any other
+ handler has been configured, as in 2.2.
+ trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1557639
+ http://svn.apache.org/r1557640
+ 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.4.x-moddir-skiphandler.diff
+ +1: covener, jim, ylavic
+ (I could be convinced to flip the default here, but I think it's too late)
PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
@@ -113,15 +121,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
has been loaded but not used, as any attempt to use mod_auth_form
without mod_request and mod_session present would cause the very
same failure. Would a warning in the release notes be good enough?
-
- * mod_dir: provide a directive to skip mod_dir processing if any other
- handler has been configured, as in 2.2.
- trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1557639
- http://svn.apache.org/r1557640
- 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/2.4.x-moddir-skiphandler.diff
- +1: covener, jim, ylavic
- (I could be convinced to flip the default here, but I think it's too late)
-
+
* mod_slotmem_shm: Remove wonky and dangerous code that knows about APR
internals. We work fine w/o it anyway at this stage.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1561385