Commits by everyone getting assigned the same userid?

[Dan Armbrust <da...@gmail.com>]

Starting about 3 weeks ago, I noticed that whenever anyone makes a 
commit into our subversion repository, the user name being stored with 
their commit is not their user name, but instead, it is mine.  I'm 
running subversion through apache -  Has anyone seen anything like this 
before? 

The only thing that I have even done lately is a slight change to the 
post-commit script - I added a '&' to the end of the svnadmin dump 
command that I was executing in the post commit script, because I was 
running into another issue -

If I was doing a large commit of files, occasionally, for some reason 
that I couldn't figure out, the post-commit script would hang - and not 
return.  This would get me into a mess, because the server has 
officially completed the commit.  But the client hasn't yet gotten a 
response that the commit completed.  Eventually, the person waiting for 
the client gets annoyed, and hits cancel.  But now they have a big mess, 
because their changes were committed, but their local workspace thinks 
that their changes were not committed.

Any ideas?

Could my change to make the post-commit script spawn the operation have 
had any affect on the username being stored with the commit?

Thanks,

Dan



-- 
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
http://informatics.mayo.edu/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Commits by everyone getting assigned the same userid?

[Dan Armbrust <da...@gmail.com>]

Dan Armbrust wrote:
> Starting about 3 weeks ago, I noticed that whenever anyone makes a 
> commit into our subversion repository, the user name being stored with 
> their commit is not their user name, but instead, it is mine.  I'm 
> running subversion through apache -  Has anyone seen anything like this 
> before?
> The only thing that I have even done lately is a slight change to the 
> post-commit script - I added a '&' to the end of the svnadmin dump 
> command that I was executing in the post commit script, because I was 
> running into another issue -
> 
> If I was doing a large commit of files, occasionally, for some reason 
> that I couldn't figure out, the post-commit script would hang - and not 
> return.  This would get me into a mess, because the server has 
> officially completed the commit.  But the client hasn't yet gotten a 
> response that the commit completed.  Eventually, the person waiting for 
> the client gets annoyed, and hits cancel.  But now they have a big mess, 
> because their changes were committed, but their local workspace thinks 
> that their changes were not committed.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Could my change to make the post-commit script spawn the operation have 
> had any affect on the username being stored with the commit?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dan
> 

Did this message go through?
> 


-- 
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
http://informatics.mayo.edu/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org