You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to builds@apache.org by Sim IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> on 2010/11/25 09:47:35 UTC
guidelines
Are there guidelines for the use of hudson?
I felt rather anti-social with the river QA jobs and have resorted to
only start them by hand.
But from the looks of the pileup right now, my attempts at preventing a
one were in vain. (At least they are not caused by me).
I much rather have the QA jobs running automatically. What do you
prefer, advise?
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
Re: guidelines
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
> On 25-11-10 09:52, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG<si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there guidelines for the use of hudson?
>>
>> The best we got are http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson
>
>> Use one of these locks for long running builds (> 1 hour):
>>
>> * Long-running jobs on minerva.apache.org
>> * Long-running jobs on vesta.apache.org
>> * Long-running jobs on Ubuntu (ie. both vesta and minerva)
>
> Use one of these locks for long running builds (> 1 hour):
>
> * Long-running jobs on ubuntu1 (minerva.apache.org)
> * Long-running jobs on ubuntu2 (vesta.apache.org)
> * Long-running jobs on Ubuntu (ie. both vesta and minerva)
>
> Better?
Also needs update to cover additional slaves, like much else on that page :-/
/niklas
Re: guidelines
Posted by Sim IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl>.
On 25-11-10 09:52, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG<si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
>> Are there guidelines for the use of hudson?
>
> The best we got are http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson
> Use one of these locks for long running builds (> 1 hour):
>
> * Long-running jobs on minerva.apache.org
> * Long-running jobs on vesta.apache.org
> * Long-running jobs on Ubuntu (ie. both vesta and minerva)
Use one of these locks for long running builds (> 1 hour):
* Long-running jobs on ubuntu1 (minerva.apache.org)
* Long-running jobs on ubuntu2 (vesta.apache.org)
* Long-running jobs on Ubuntu (ie. both vesta and minerva)
Better?
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
Re: guidelines
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
> Are there guidelines for the use of hudson?
The best we got are http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson
> I felt rather anti-social with the river QA jobs and have resorted to only
> start them by hand.
>
> But from the looks of the pileup right now, my attempts at preventing a one
> were in vain. (At least they are not caused by me).
>
> I much rather have the QA jobs running automatically. What do you prefer,
> advise?
Most builds checks SVN every hour or so (not more frequent) and build
on changes.
/niklas