T_* rules in 72_active.cf

[Axb <ax...@gmail.com>]

After last SA update I'm still seeing a large bunch of T_ rules in 
72_active.cf

Would sandbox owners please do the tag magic to prevent this? or make 
them active if good enough.

We dont' really need stuff like:

meta T_SURBL_MULTI2   ((URIBL_JP_SURBL + URIBL_SC_SURBL + URIBL_AB_SURBL 
+ URIBL_OB_SURBL + URIBL_WS_SURBL) > 2)

meta T_SURBL_MULTI3   ((URIBL_JP_SURBL + URIBL_SC_SURBL + URIBL_AB_SURBL 
+ URIBL_OB_SURBL + URIBL_WS_SURBL) > 3)

meta T_SURBL_MULTI4   ((URIBL_JP_SURBL + URIBL_SC_SURBL + URIBL_AB_SURBL 
+ URIBL_OB_SURBL + URIBL_WS_SURBL) > 4)

meta T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP (URIBL_BLACK && (URIBL_AB_SURBL || 
URIBL_JP_SURBL || URIBL_OB_SURBL || URIBL_WS_SURBL || URIBL_SC_SURBL))

etc, etc

Thanks

Axb

-- 
Do not use SARE rules - use sa-update

Re: T_* rules in 72_active.cf

["Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>]

On 6/28/2011 8:36 AM, Axb wrote:
> After last SA update I'm still seeing a large bunch of T_ rules in 
> 72_active.cf 

T_rules have been going out for a while it appears.  Issue 6257 is open 
and covers the issue 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6527 with 
comments added for what you've found below, thanks!

Regards,
KAM