Re: [PATCH] event driven MPM

[Brian Akins <ba...@web.turner.com>]

Greg Ames wrote:

>
> Bill Stoddard created an event driven socket I/O patch a couple of 
> years ago that could serve pages.  I picked it up and decided to see 
> if I could simplify it to minimize the changes to request processing.


What's the status of this?  I'd be willing to help if needed.  We are 
interested in this.


-- 
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies

Re: [PATCH] event driven MPM

[Brian Akins <ba...@web.turner.com>]

Paul Querna wrote:

>
>My basic question for the list is, are we better off modifying
>the Worker MPM, or should we create a new 'event' MPM for now?
>  
>
My $.02 worht:

Make an event MPM that is experimental.  That way people can use "tried 
and true" worker, or try the fancy new event one.

-- 
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies

Re: [PATCH] event driven MPM

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 08:18 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
> Greg Ames wrote:
> > Bill Stoddard created an event driven socket I/O patch a couple of 
> > years ago that could serve pages.  I picked it up and decided to see 
> > if I could simplify it to minimize the changes to request processing.
>
> What's the status of this?  I'd be willing to help if needed.  We are 
> interested in this.
> 

I am interested in it too.  I talked to Greg Ames a week ago, and he
doesn't have any updates for the patch.  I planned on mailing this list
about it later this week.

I would like to get the patch(or something based off of it) into CVS
soon.  My basic question for the list is, are we better off modifying
the Worker MPM, or should we create a new 'event' MPM for now?

-Paul Querna