You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Michael-Fever <de...@gmail.com> on 2018/10/07 00:53:58 UTC

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

Aww, all I care about is getting 2.4.36 going so I can say I have TLS 1.3
supported with my h2.  LOL, no but seriously, is 2.4.36 stable enough to be
using?



--
Sent from: http://apache-http-server.18135.x6.nabble.com/Apache-HTTP-Server-Dev-f4771363.html

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

Posted by Stefan Eissing <st...@greenbytes.de>.

> Am 07.10.2018 um 03:16 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <dr...@primary.net>:
> 
> Actually, I'm glad you asked. I committed after 2.4.35 to T&R 2.4.36 soon after. I'm happy to do that ASAP if there are no objections.
> 
> What say you, fellow devs? How about next week?
> -- 
> Daniel Ruggeri
> 
> On October 6, 2018 7:53:58 PM CDT, Michael-Fever <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Aww, all I care about is getting 2.4.36 going so I can say I have TLS 1.3
> supported with my h2.  LOL, no but seriously, is 2.4.36 stable enough to be
> using?

+1

Very happy to see that. Thanks, Daniel!

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 07 Oct 2018, at 03:16, Daniel Ruggeri <dr...@primary.net> wrote:

> Actually, I'm glad you asked. I committed after 2.4.35 to T&R 2.4.36 soon after. I'm happy to do that ASAP if there are no objections.
> 
> What say you, fellow devs? How about next week?

+1 and thank you. Would be good to see TLS 1.3 out the door.

Regards,
Graham
—

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

Posted by Daniel Ruggeri <dr...@primary.net>.
Actually, I'm glad you asked. I committed after 2.4.35 to T&R 2.4.36 soon after. I'm happy to do that ASAP if there are no objections.

What say you, fellow devs? How about next week?
-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

On October 6, 2018 7:53:58 PM CDT, Michael-Fever <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Aww, all I care about is getting 2.4.36 going so I can say I have TLS
>1.3
>supported with my h2.  LOL, no but seriously, is 2.4.36 stable enough
>to be
>using?
>
>
>
>--
>Sent from:
>http://apache-http-server.18135.x6.nabble.com/Apache-HTTP-Server-Dev-f4771363.html

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Since this tag is only days away, the committers would really appreciate
any feedback from early adopters. I'm not certain on the status of the auth
hook fix, but believe it's certainly ready to have the tires kicked, so we
can avoid any quirks resulting from the TLS 1.3 efforts.

Please feel free to try it from the 2.4.x branch and let us know your
observations. I believe it is stable enough for review now.


On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 19:54 Michael-Fever <de...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Aww, all I care about is getting 2.4.36 going so I can say I have TLS 1.3
> supported with my h2.  LOL, no but seriously, is 2.4.36 stable enough to be
> using?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://apache-http-server.18135.x6.nabble.com/Apache-HTTP-Server-Dev-f4771363.html
>