You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Radhika Puthiyetath <ra...@citrix.com> on 2013/08/02 14:18:44 UTC
[Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Hi,
PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141), and provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
RE: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Posted by Radhika Puthiyetath <ra...@citrix.com>.
The comments are incorporated.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850
-Radhika
-----Original Message-----
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:54 AM
To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Sudha Ponnaganti
Subject: Re: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Hi Radhika,
Thank you for your work! Some comments:
<quote>
For other Catalyst PVLAN support switch, connect the switch to upper switch by using cables. The number of cables should be greater than the number of PVLANs used.
</quote>
This is a little confusion. Should be "by using multiple cables, which one cable for each PVLAN pair". And the last sentence is not necessary.
<quote>
OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN. Therefore, simulate PVLAN on OVS for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table and tagging every traffic leaving guest VMs with the secondary VLAN ID.
</quote>
I think the following description is more clear:
"OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN natively. Therefore, CloudStack managed to simulate PVLAN on OVS for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table."
--Sheng
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath < radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
>
> Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141),
> and provide your feedback.
>
> Regards
> -Radhika
>
>
>
RE: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Posted by Radhika Puthiyetath <ra...@citrix.com>.
The comments are incorporated.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850
-Radhika
-----Original Message-----
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:54 AM
To: <de...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Sudha Ponnaganti
Subject: Re: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Hi Radhika,
Thank you for your work! Some comments:
<quote>
For other Catalyst PVLAN support switch, connect the switch to upper switch by using cables. The number of cables should be greater than the number of PVLANs used.
</quote>
This is a little confusion. Should be "by using multiple cables, which one cable for each PVLAN pair". And the last sentence is not necessary.
<quote>
OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN. Therefore, simulate PVLAN on OVS for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table and tagging every traffic leaving guest VMs with the secondary VLAN ID.
</quote>
I think the following description is more clear:
"OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN natively. Therefore, CloudStack managed to simulate PVLAN on OVS for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table."
--Sheng
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath < radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
>
> Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141),
> and provide your feedback.
>
> Regards
> -Radhika
>
>
>
Re: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Posted by Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>.
Hi Radhika,
Thank you for your work! Some comments:
<quote>
For other Catalyst PVLAN support switch, connect the switch to upper switch
by using cables. The number of cables should be greater than the number of
PVLANs used.
</quote>
This is a little confusion. Should be "by using multiple cables, which one
cable for each PVLAN pair". And the last sentence is not necessary.
<quote>
OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN. Therefore, simulate PVLAN
on OVS
for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table and tagging every traffic
leaving guest VMs
with the secondary VLAN ID.
</quote>
I think the following description is more clear:
"OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN natively. Therefore,
CloudStack managed to simulate PVLAN on OVS
for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table."
--Sheng
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath <
radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
>
> Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141), and
> provide your feedback.
>
> Regards
> -Radhika
>
>
>
Re: [Doc] PVLAN Doc is Ready for Review
Posted by Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>.
Hi Radhika,
Thank you for your work! Some comments:
<quote>
For other Catalyst PVLAN support switch, connect the switch to upper switch
by using cables. The number of cables should be greater than the number of
PVLANs used.
</quote>
This is a little confusion. Should be "by using multiple cables, which one
cable for each PVLAN pair". And the last sentence is not necessary.
<quote>
OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN. Therefore, simulate PVLAN
on OVS
for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table and tagging every traffic
leaving guest VMs
with the secondary VLAN ID.
</quote>
I think the following description is more clear:
"OVS on XenServer and KVM does not support PVLAN natively. Therefore,
CloudStack managed to simulate PVLAN on OVS
for XenServer and KVM by modifying the flow table."
--Sheng
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath <
radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PVLAN documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-850.
>
> Please see 15.14. Isolation in Advanced Zone Using Private VLAN (141), and
> provide your feedback.
>
> Regards
> -Radhika
>
>
>