You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ode.apache.org by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> on 2008/11/11 16:06:31 UTC
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Guys,
> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out performs
> other
> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>
> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100 threads)
>
> Test case:
> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
> String.
> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of that
> many times. Psuedo code:
> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> int index = 0, count = 0;
> int length = data.length;
> while (index++ < iteration) {
> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> }
> }
>
> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>
> Result:
> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>
> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>
> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> See attachments below.
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>.
JDK 1.5_0_16
Service 3.2.2 : Standalone mode :
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=%2Fservicemix%2Fservicemix-3%2F3.2.2%2Fapache-servicemix-3.2.2.tar.gz
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=%2Fservicemix%2Fservicemix-3%2F3.2.2%2Fapache-servicemix-3.2.2.tar.gz
Apache Ode 1.2
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/ode/apache-ode-jbi-1.2.zip
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/ode/apache-ode-jbi-1.2.zip
Glassfish: V2-UR2-b4-20080411
OpenESB:080909
Sun-bpel: 080909 release
Again uploading openesb assembly and http-binding in the initial post.
Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>
> Yes, good idea. Do you also have the assembly for OpenESB so I can do
> comparisons on my machine?
>
> Also, what version of Apache Ode are you testing? There's bound to be
> differences between 1.2, 1.x branch (1.3) and the trunk (2.0).
>
> alex
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I apologies for that. I thought including in the original post will help
>> other people also.
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks. I had to look at the Nabble.com post to find it.
>> >
>> > I'll look into it.
>> >
>> > alex
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:47 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce
>> >> your
>> >> > tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too
>> >> little
>> >> > information to help.
>> >> >
>> >> > alex
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
>> >> >> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We
>> >> executed
>> >> >> same
>> >> >> service on same testbed.
>> >> >> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this
>> >> solutions.
>> >> >> Used as is.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing
>> >> >> something.
>> >> >> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
>> >> >> threads
>> >> >> or any other optimization.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on
>> both
>> >> >> > engines?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > alex
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes
>> App
>> >> >> Server,
>> >> >> >> ESB
>> >> >> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
>> >> >> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
>> >> >> preliminary
>> >> >> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in
>> >> terms
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
>> >> >> independently
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL
>> >> engine,
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > alex
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Guys,
>> >> >> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our
>> >> Service
>> >> >> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
>> >> >> performs
>> >> >> >> >> other
>> >> >> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE
>> having
>> >> poor
>> >> >> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with
>> >> glassfish
>> >> >> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
>> >> >> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
>> >> >> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads
>> (Total
>> >> 100
>> >> >> >> >> threads)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Test case:
>> >> >> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and
>> 2nd
>> >> as
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >> >> String.
>> >> >> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while
>> loop
>> >> of
>> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
>> >> >> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
>> >> >> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
>> >> >> >> >> int length = data.length;
>> >> >> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
>> >> >> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
>> >> >> >> >> }
>> >> >> >> >> }
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Result:
>> >> >> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
>> >> >> >> >> 1 ------- 798 -----
>> 930
>> >> >> >> >> 10 -------- 357 -----
>> 933
>> >> >> >> >> 100 -------- 49 -----
>> 483
>> >> >> >> >> 500 ------- 9 -----
>> 123
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
>> >> >> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix
>> performance.
>> >> >> >> >> See attachments below.
>> >> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
>> >> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at
>> >> Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
>> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
>> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
>> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20446065.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20446407.html
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
Yes, good idea. Do you also have the assembly for OpenESB so I can do
comparisons on my machine?
Also, what version of Apache Ode are you testing? There's bound to be
differences between 1.2, 1.x branch (1.3) and the trunk (2.0).
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I apologies for that. I thought including in the original post will help
> other people also.
>
> Thx.
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. I had to look at the Nabble.com post to find it.
> >
> > I'll look into it.
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:47 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce
> >> your
> >> > tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too
> >> little
> >> > information to help.
> >> >
> >> > alex
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
> >> >> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We
> >> executed
> >> >> same
> >> >> service on same testbed.
> >> >> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this
> >> solutions.
> >> >> Used as is.
> >> >>
> >> >> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing
> >> >> something.
> >> >> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
> >> >> threads
> >> >> or any other optimization.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
> >> >> > engines?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > alex
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
> >> >> Server,
> >> >> >> ESB
> >> >> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> >> >> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
> >> >> preliminary
> >> >> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in
> >> terms
> >> >> of
> >> >> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
> >> >> independently
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL
> >> engine,
> >> >> with
> >> >> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > alex
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Guys,
> >> >> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our
> >> Service
> >> >> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
> >> >> performs
> >> >> >> >> other
> >> >> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having
> >> poor
> >> >> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with
> >> glassfish
> >> >> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> >> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> >> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total
> >> 100
> >> >> >> >> threads)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Test case:
> >> >> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and
> 2nd
> >> as
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> >> String.
> >> >> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while
> loop
> >> of
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> >> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >> >> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
> >> >> >> >> int length = data.length;
> >> >> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
> >> >> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Result:
> >> >> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> >> >> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> >> >> >> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> >> >> >> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> >> >> >> >> 500 ------- 9 -----
> 123
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> >> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> >> >> >> See attachments below.
> >> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20446065.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>.
I apologies for that. I thought including in the original post will help
other people also.
Thx.
Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>
> Thanks. I had to look at the Nabble.com post to find it.
>
> I'll look into it.
>
> alex
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:47 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >
>> > If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce
>> your
>> > tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too
>> little
>> > information to help.
>> >
>> > alex
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
>> >> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We
>> executed
>> >> same
>> >> service on same testbed.
>> >> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this
>> solutions.
>> >> Used as is.
>> >>
>> >> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing
>> >> something.
>> >> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
>> >> threads
>> >> or any other optimization.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
>> >> >
>> >> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
>> >> > engines?
>> >> >
>> >> > alex
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
>> >> Server,
>> >> >> ESB
>> >> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
>> >> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
>> >> preliminary
>> >> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in
>> terms
>> >> of
>> >> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
>> >> independently
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL
>> engine,
>> >> with
>> >> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > alex
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Guys,
>> >> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our
>> Service
>> >> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
>> >> performs
>> >> >> >> other
>> >> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having
>> poor
>> >> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with
>> glassfish
>> >> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
>> >> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
>> >> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total
>> 100
>> >> >> >> threads)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Test case:
>> >> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd
>> as
>> >> a
>> >> >> >> String.
>> >> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop
>> of
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
>> >> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
>> >> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
>> >> >> >> int length = data.length;
>> >> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
>> >> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
>> >> >> >> }
>> >> >> >> }
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Result:
>> >> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
>> >> >> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
>> >> >> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
>> >> >> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
>> >> >> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
>> >> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
>> >> >> >> See attachments below.
>> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
>> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
>> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
>> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20446065.html
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
Thanks. I had to look at the Nabble.com post to find it.
I'll look into it.
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:47 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce your
> > tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too little
> > information to help.
> >
> > alex
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
> >> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We executed
> >> same
> >> service on same testbed.
> >> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this solutions.
> >> Used as is.
> >>
> >> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing
> >> something.
> >> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
> >> threads
> >> or any other optimization.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
> >> >
> >> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
> >> > engines?
> >> >
> >> > alex
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
> >> Server,
> >> >> ESB
> >> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> >> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
> >> >>
> >> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
> >> preliminary
> >> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms
> >> of
> >> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
> >> independently
> >> >> to
> >> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine,
> >> with
> >> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > alex
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Guys,
> >> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> >> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
> >> performs
> >> >> >> other
> >> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having
> poor
> >> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> >> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
> >> >> >> threads)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Test case:
> >> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd
> as
> >> a
> >> >> >> String.
> >> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop
> of
> >> >> that
> >> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
> >> >> >> int length = data.length;
> >> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
> >> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Result:
> >> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> >> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> >> >> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> >> >> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> >> >> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> >> >> See attachments below.
> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>.
Uploaded Loop-sa.zip file in initial post.
Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>
> If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce your
> tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too little
> information to help.
>
> alex
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
>> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We executed
>> same
>> service on same testbed.
>> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this solutions.
>> Used as is.
>>
>> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing
>> something.
>> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to
>> threads
>> or any other optimization.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >
>> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
>> >
>> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
>> > engines?
>> >
>> > alex
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
>> Server,
>> >> ESB
>> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>> >>
>> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
>> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
>> >>
>> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our
>> preliminary
>> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms
>> of
>> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine
>> independently
>> >> to
>> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine,
>> with
>> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
>> >> >
>> >> > alex
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Guys,
>> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
>> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
>> performs
>> >> >> other
>> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
>> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
>> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
>> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
>> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
>> >> >> threads)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Test case:
>> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as
>> a
>> >> >> String.
>> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of
>> >> that
>> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
>> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
>> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
>> >> >> int length = data.length;
>> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
>> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
>> >> >> }
>> >> >> }
>> >> >>
>> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Result:
>> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
>> >> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
>> >> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
>> >> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
>> >> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
>> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
>> >> >> See attachments below.
>> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
>> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
>> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20445804.html
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
If you can provide an assembly packaging that I can use to reproduce your
tests, I can probably offer some guidance. Right now, we have too little
information to help.
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:10 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> 1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
> 2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We executed
> same
> service on same testbed.
> 3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this solutions.
> Used as is.
>
> So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing something.
> Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to threads
> or any other optimization.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > Right, but that's not answering my question.
> >
> > How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
> > engines?
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App
> Server,
> >> ESB
> >> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
> >>
> >> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> >> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
> >>
> >> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our preliminary
> >> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms of
> >> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine independently
> >> to
> >> find out what is the performance of individual component.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine,
> with
> >> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >> >
> >> > alex
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Guys,
> >> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> >> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out
> performs
> >> >> other
> >> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
> >> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >> >>
> >> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> >> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
> >> >> threads)
> >> >>
> >> >> Test case:
> >> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
> >> >> String.
> >> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of
> >> that
> >> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
> >> >> int length = data.length;
> >> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
> >> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >> >> }
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >> >>
> >> >> Result:
> >> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
> >> >>
> >> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> >> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> >> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> >> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
> >> >>
> >> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> >> See attachments below.
> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>.
1. We are using non-persistent connection in both.
2. See attached loop.bpel and loopIn.wsdl in original post. We executed same
service on same testbed.
3. We did not tweak any performance parameters on any of this solutions.
Used as is.
So it i apple to apple comparison. Let me know if I am missing something.
Also can you tell me if you know any performance tuning related to threads
or any other optimization.
Thanks
Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>
> Right, but that's not answering my question.
>
> How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both
> engines?
>
> alex
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App Server,
>> ESB
>> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>>
>> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
>> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
>>
>> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our preliminary
>> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms of
>> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine independently
>> to
>> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>>
>>
>>
>> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>> >
>> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
>> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
>> >
>> > alex
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Guys,
>> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
>> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out performs
>> >> other
>> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
>> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>> >>
>> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
>> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
>> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
>> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
>> >> threads)
>> >>
>> >> Test case:
>> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
>> >> String.
>> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of
>> that
>> >> many times. Psuedo code:
>> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
>> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
>> >> int length = data.length;
>> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
>> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>> >>
>> >> Result:
>> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>> >>
>> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
>> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
>> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
>> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
>> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>> >>
>> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
>> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
>> >> See attachments below.
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>> >>
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
>> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20442734.html
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
Right, but that's not answering my question.
How do you know you're testing the same quality-of-service on both engines?
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:16 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App Server,
> ESB
> and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
>
> 1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
> 2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
>
> As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our preliminary
> performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms of
> performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine independently to
> find out what is the performance of individual component.
>
>
>
> Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
> >
> > Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
> > respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Guys,
> >> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
> >> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out performs
> >> other
> >> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
> >> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
> >>
> >> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
> >> ESB/Sun-bpel.
> >> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
> >> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
> >> threads)
> >>
> >> Test case:
> >> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
> >> String.
> >> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of that
> >> many times. Psuedo code:
> >> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
> >> int index = 0, count = 0;
> >> int length = data.length;
> >> while (index++ < iteration) {
> >> count = (index + 1) % length ;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
> >>
> >> Result:
> >> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
> >>
> >> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
> >> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
> >> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
> >> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
> >> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
> >>
> >> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
> >> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
> >> See attachments below.
> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
> >>
> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: Apache ODE performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine Performance
Posted by rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com>.
We are evaluating SOA solution for our company which includes App Server, ESB
and BPEL Engine and decided to either go with
1. JBoss, ServiceMix and Apache ODE
2. Glassfish, OpenESB and Sun-Bpel engine (part of ODE).
As a developer, we preferred 1st solutions but based on our preliminary
performance results, we found that Apache ODE is bottleneck in terms of
performance so we decided to test ODE and Sun-bpel engine independently to
find out what is the performance of individual component.
Alex Boisvert-3 wrote:
>
> Are you testing comparable quality-of-service on each BPEL engine, with
> respect to persistence, event generation, etc?
>
> alex
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, rjoshi <ri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Guys,
>> We are evaluating Apache ODE and Sun BPEL Engine for our Service
>> Orchestration application. I read in many blogs that ODE out performs
>> other
>> BPEL engine (no one gave real numbers) but we found ODE having poor
>> performance compare to Sun BPEL Engine (OpenESB).
>>
>> We ran two tests. One with ServiceMix/ODE and other with glassfish
>> ESB/Sun-bpel.
>> Server: RedHat AS (Linux quad core)
>> Client: 4 client machine running jmeter with 25 threads (Total 100
>> threads)
>>
>> Test case:
>> One incoming SOAP request with 1st parameter as a number and 2nd as a
>> String.
>> Inside BPEL, based on 1st parameter, we are executing while loop of that
>> many times. Psuedo code:
>> function testLoop(int iteration, string data) {
>> int index = 0, count = 0;
>> int length = data.length;
>> while (index++ < iteration) {
>> count = (index + 1) % length ;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> See attached loop.BPEL and loopIn.wsdl
>>
>> Result:
>> 2nd and 3rd columns are throughput/second. Higher is better.
>>
>> Number of Loops--------ServiceMix/ODE----OpenESB/Sun-BPEL
>> 1 ------- 798 ----- 930
>> 10 -------- 357 ----- 933
>> 100 -------- 49 ----- 483
>> 500 ------- 9 ----- 123
>>
>> Please let me know if we are missing something. Any
>> suggestions/comments/tunings to improve servicemix performance.
>> See attachments below.
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loop.bpel loop.bpel
>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p20440881/loopIn.wsdl loopIn.wsdl
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20440881.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-ODE-performance-compare-to-Sun--BPEL-Engine-Performance-tp20440881p20441640.html
Sent from the Apache Ode User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.