You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to doxia-dev@maven.apache.org by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org> on 2007/08/31 21:46:06 UTC
Re: svn commit: r571452 - /maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
Is there a non-SNAPSHOT release of these taglets in sight soon?
I was hoping to start to prepare for releasing doxia this weekend.
vsiveton@apache.org wrote:
> Author: vsiveton
> Date: Fri Aug 31 05:58:28 2007
> New Revision: 571452
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571452&view=rev
> Log:
> o using plexus-javadoc
>
> Modified:
> maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml?rev=571452&r1=571451&r2=571452&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml Fri Aug 31 05:58:28 2007
> @@ -83,6 +83,32 @@
> <link>http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils/apidocs/</link>
> <link>http://junit.sourceforge.net/javadoc/</link>
> </links>
> + <taglets>
> + <taglet>
> + <tagletClass>org.codehaus.plexus.javadoc.PlexusComponentTaglet</tagletClass>
> + <tagletArtifact>
> + <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> + <artifactId>plexus-javadoc</artifactId>
> + <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> + </tagletArtifact>
> + </taglet>
> + <taglet>
> + <tagletClass>org.codehaus.plexus.javadoc.PlexusConfigurationTaglet</tagletClass>
> + <tagletArtifact>
> + <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> + <artifactId>plexus-javadoc</artifactId>
> + <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> + </tagletArtifact>
> + </taglet>
> + <taglet>
> + <tagletClass>org.codehaus.plexus.javadoc.PlexusRequirementTaglet</tagletClass>
> + <tagletArtifact>
> + <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> + <artifactId>plexus-javadoc</artifactId>
> + <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> + </tagletArtifact>
> + </taglet>
> + </taglets>
> <reportSets>
> <reportSet>
> <id>html</id>
>
>
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: svn commit: r571452 - /maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>:
> Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > 2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>:
> >> Is there a non-SNAPSHOT release of these taglets in sight soon?
> >
> > no idea so I will comment them.
>
> Good. Is their purpose to generate javadoc for the plexus specific
> annotations?
Yep. See PLXUTILS-41
> >> I was hoping to start to prepare for releasing doxia this weekend.
> >
> > Before that, I want to know what we decide about doxia-book: promotion
> > or not? I think it is enough mature to be promoted as alpha. WDYT?
>
> It doesn't matter to me. I haven't used doxia-book myself, so I'm fine
> with whatever its users say.
Ok I will start a promote vote soon.
Cheers,
Vincent
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
Re: svn commit: r571452 - /maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> 2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>:
>> Is there a non-SNAPSHOT release of these taglets in sight soon?
>
> no idea so I will comment them.
Good. Is their purpose to generate javadoc for the plexus specific
annotations?
>> I was hoping to start to prepare for releasing doxia this weekend.
>
> Before that, I want to know what we decide about doxia-book: promotion
> or not? I think it is enough mature to be promoted as alpha. WDYT?
It doesn't matter to me. I haven't used doxia-book myself, so I'm fine
with whatever its users say.
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
> [SNIP]
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
Re: svn commit: r571452 - /maven/doxia/doxia/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi again,
2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>:
> Is there a non-SNAPSHOT release of these taglets in sight soon?
no idea so I will comment them.
> I was hoping to start to prepare for releasing doxia this weekend.
Before that, I want to know what we decide about doxia-book: promotion
or not? I think it is enough mature to be promoted as alpha. WDYT?
Cheers,
Vincent
[SNIP]