You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/03/24 15:53:45 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5654] -
PS rendering doesn't seem to support landscape pages
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5654>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5654
PS rendering doesn't seem to support landscape pages
jsightler@eximtechnologies.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jsightler@eximtechnologies.c
| |om
------- Additional Comments From jsightler@eximtechnologies.com 2003-03-24 14:53 -------
Jeremias Maerki <je...@outline.ch> (email seemingly no longer valid)
mentioned on June 17, 2002:
> write("%%Page: " + page.getNumber() + " " + page.getNumber());
> if (page.getHeight() > page.getWidth()) {
> write("%%PageBoundingBox: 0 0 " + pw + " " + ph);
> write("%%PageOrientation: Portrait");
> } else {
> write("%%PageBoundingBox: 0 0 " + ph + " " + pw);
> write("%%PageOrientation: Landscape");
> }
> write("%%BeginPageSetup");
Could fix this problem.
Is there any reason why a patch such as this shouldn't be applied?
We really need Landscape rendering here (of course, we'll just patch it
ourselves for the time being, but it would be nice if there were an "official" fix).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org