JMX remoting (was Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-1469) AMQUserManagementMBean.getCurrentJMXUser no longer returns a valid user[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED])

[Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org>]

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Robbie Gemmell <ge...@dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:

> Could do, although the issue there is that MX4J doesnt implement the JMXMP
> connector and instead have its own connectors based on soap, hessian, or
> burlap which all require Jetty or such like to communicate via http, so that
> means adding that too on broker and console sides.

I think that's a better solution than saying "oh, hey, go download
this other random thing if you want authentication". That's just weak.

- Aidan
-- 
Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid
"Have we anything resembling a plan?" "Mm-hm. Ride till we find
them... and kill them all." - The 13th Warrior

Re: JMX remoting (was Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-1469) AMQUserManagementMBean.getCurrentJMXUser no longer returns a valid user[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED])[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED]

[Robbie Gemmell <ge...@dcs.gla.ac.uk>]

Well it does sound a little naff when put like that :P

On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 11:03 +0000, Aidan Skinner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Robbie Gemmell <ge...@dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Could do, although the issue there is that MX4J doesnt implement the JMXMP
> > connector and instead have its own connectors based on soap, hessian, or
> > burlap which all require Jetty or such like to communicate via http, so that
> > means adding that too on broker and console sides.
> 
> I think that's a better solution than saying "oh, hey, go download
> this other random thing if you want authentication". That's just weak.
> 
> - Aidan