You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chemistry.apache.org by Gabriele Columbro <ga...@alfresco.com> on 2010/06/07 12:18:43 UTC
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hey guys,
great job, this is a perfect example of proper leveraging of the CMIS
API (and the OpenCMIS layer). Kudos Mau!
Cross-posting this to the chemistry-dev@ list, best place to discuss
whether we could proceed already with an alpha release.
@chemistry-devs: as I'm unsure when we're planning to do our first
"official" release, I was wondering if we could test-drive the process
by deploying an alpha release (non SNAPSHOT) on the apache releases
repo?
One additional reason would be preventing people building from trunk
and starting releasing their custom named/versioned versions on
corporate Maven repositories.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Maurizio Pillitu wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> thanks a lot for your advises; we're already working on it; we'll
> notify you when the code is ready.
>
> One question: we're currently depending on
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-client-impl</artifactId>
> <version>0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> Would be possible for you to release a non SNAPSHOT version? Even
> marking it as alpha or beta would be enough, so that our maven-based
> release process won't complain :-)
>
> Gabriele Columbro is in CC since I suspect he's involved in the
> OpenCMIS release phase.
>
> TIA
> mau
>
> On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Florian Müller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First of all, great work!
>>
>> I'm Florian and I'm an OpenCMIS committer. I had a look at your
>> source
>> code and I have a suggestion for improvement. You can increase the
>> performance (fewer calls to the repository) and lower the memory
>> footprint (shared cache) if you would not create a session for every
>> request. You could, for example, create and store a session object in
>> ConfluenceCMISRepository and reuse it. OpenCMIS session objects are
>> thread save and can handle parallel requests.
>>
>> - Florian
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "confluence-cmis" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to confluence-
>> cmis@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to confluence-cmis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/confluence-cmis?hl=en
>> .
>>
>
> --
> Maurizio Pillitu
> http://maurizio.pillitu.name
> maurizio@pillitu.name
>
--
Gabriele Columbro
Senior Solution Engineer, EMEA-APAC Professional Services
Alfresco Software, Ltd. (http://www.alfresco.com)
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
Tweet this: #Alfresco launches Activiti BPMN 2.0 business process
engine, hires JBoss jBPM architects Tom Baeyens & Joram Barrez http://bit.ly/ceeb3c
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Gabriele Columbro <co...@gmail.com>.
Ok guys,
From the feedback received the release version we're targeting is:
0.1.0
I agree we keep the x.y.z versioning scheme standard for all releases
(will create a wiki to document that).
I'll proceed with the release preparation steps (@Florian: will ping
you for any help) and send a email to this list (and later to the
Incubator PMC [1] ) with the call for official vote.
HTH,
Gab
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Goetz, Paul wrote:
> +1
>
> I agree to omit "alpha" or "beta" like labels. In worst case we
> could go down to 0.0.1 ;o)
> But I would prefer 0.1.0 as proposed by Florian.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:fg@nuxeo.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 11:31
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Agreed too.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com>
> wrote:
>> I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> -------------
>> This message is sent from Blackberry.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>
>> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org <chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
>> Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or
>> "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API
>> changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the
>> version number 0.1.0.
>>
>> @Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release
>> preparation.
>>
>>
>> - Florian
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
>> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>>
>> Hey guys,
>> for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
>> into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process)
>> get
>> a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
>> In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
>> this release?
>>
>> E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
>> our implementation:
>>
>> - 1.0.0-alpha-1
>> - 1.0.0-beta-1
>>
>> or do you have any other ideas in mind?
>>
>> HTH,
>> Gab
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
>>> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>>>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>>>> have mentioned.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>>>> found much about
>>>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>>>
>>> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond
>>> the
>>> development community is a release and should be done following the
>>> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what
>>> to
>>> put into a release and how to label it.
>>>
>>> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for
>>> more
>>> details about making releases at Apache.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> --
>>
>> Eng. Gabriele Columbro
>> Alfresco Software, Ltd.
>>
>> M: +31 (0)627 565 103
>> P: +39 320 161 28 46
>> D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
>>
>> Skype: gabrielecolumbro
>> Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
> Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
> http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by "Goetz, Paul" <pa...@sap.com>.
+1
I agree to omit "alpha" or "beta" like labels. In worst case we could go down to 0.0.1 ;o)
But I would prefer 0.1.0 as proposed by Florian.
-----Original Message-----
From: Florent Guillaume [mailto:fg@nuxeo.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 11:31
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Agreed too.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com> wrote:
> I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
>
> Jens
>
> -------------
> This message is sent from Blackberry.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org <ch...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
> Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the version number 0.1.0.
>
> @Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release preparation.
>
>
> - Florian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Hey guys,
> for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
> into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) get
> a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
> In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
> this release?
>
> E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
> our implementation:
>
> - 1.0.0-alpha-1
> - 1.0.0-beta-1
>
> or do you have any other ideas in mind?
>
> HTH,
> Gab
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
>> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>>> have mentioned.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>>> found much about
>>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>>
>> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
>> development community is a release and should be done following the
>> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
>> put into a release and how to label it.
>>
>> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
>> details about making releases at Apache.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>
> --
>
> Eng. Gabriele Columbro
> Alfresco Software, Ltd.
>
> M: +31 (0)627 565 103
> P: +39 320 161 28 46
> D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
>
> Skype: gabrielecolumbro
> Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
>
>
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Florent Guillaume <fg...@nuxeo.com>.
Agreed too.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com> wrote:
> I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
>
> Jens
>
> -------------
> This message is sent from Blackberry.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org <ch...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
> Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the version number 0.1.0.
>
> @Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release preparation.
>
>
> - Florian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
> Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
>
> Hey guys,
> for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
> into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) get
> a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
> In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
> this release?
>
> E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
> our implementation:
>
> - 1.0.0-alpha-1
> - 1.0.0-beta-1
>
> or do you have any other ideas in mind?
>
> HTH,
> Gab
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
>> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>>> have mentioned.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>>> found much about
>>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>>
>> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
>> development community is a release and should be done following the
>> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
>> put into a release and how to label it.
>>
>> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
>> details about making releases at Apache.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>
> --
>
> Eng. Gabriele Columbro
> Alfresco Software, Ltd.
>
> M: +31 (0)627 565 103
> P: +39 320 161 28 46
> D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
>
> Skype: gabrielecolumbro
> Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
>
>
>
>
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Jens Hübel <jh...@opentext.com>.
I agree to Florian and the 0.1 version.
Jens
-------------
This message is sent from Blackberry.
----- Original Message -----
From: Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org <ch...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Tue Jun 08 09:42:21 2010
Subject: RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hi,
I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the version number 0.1.0.
@Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release preparation.
- Florian
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hey guys,
for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) get
a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
this release?
E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
our implementation:
- 1.0.0-alpha-1
- 1.0.0-beta-1
or do you have any other ideas in mind?
HTH,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>> have mentioned.
>
> +1
>
>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>> found much about
>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>
> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
> development community is a release and should be done following the
> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
> put into a release and how to label it.
>
> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
> details about making releases at Apache.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>.
Hi,
I think the code is stable enough that we don't need an "alpha" or "beta" label. On the other hand, we know that there will be API changes in the (near?) future. So I suggest we start with the version number 0.1.0.
@Gabriele: Let me know if I can support you with the release preparation.
- Florian
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:columbro@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 22:37
To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hey guys,
for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) get
a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
this release?
E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
our implementation:
- 1.0.0-alpha-1
- 1.0.0-beta-1
or do you have any other ideas in mind?
HTH,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>> have mentioned.
>
> +1
>
>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>> found much about
>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>
> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
> development community is a release and should be done following the
> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
> put into a release and how to label it.
>
> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
> details about making releases at Apache.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Gabriele Columbro <co...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys,
for now I redeployed the latest OpenCMIS SNAPSHOT, will look tomorrow
into how we can practically (with the current Ant release process) get
a release out there (also on the Apache Maven repo).
In such a case, what would be the version we would like to give to
this release?
E.g. which one of the following does better reflect the readiness of
our implementation:
- 1.0.0-alpha-1
- 1.0.0-beta-1
or do you have any other ideas in mind?
HTH,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller
> <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
>> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you
>> have mentioned.
>
> +1
>
>> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't
>> found much about
>> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>
> From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
> development community is a release and should be done following the
> relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
> put into a release and how to label it.
>
> See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
> details about making releases at Apache.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
--
Eng. Gabriele Columbro
Alfresco Software, Ltd.
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com> wrote:
> I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you have mentioned.
+1
> What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't found much about
> those types of releases on the Apache website.
>From the ASF perspective anything that a project publishes beyond the
development community is a release and should be done following the
relevant Apache policies. It's up to each community to decide what to
put into a release and how to label it.
See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html for more
details about making releases at Apache.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
RE: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Posted by Florian Müller <fm...@opentext.com>.
Hi Gabriele,
I think we should do some sort of release soon for the reasons you have mentioned.
What are the Apache rules for alpha and beta releases? I haven't found much about those types of releases on the Apache website.
- Florian
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriele Columbro [mailto:gabriele.columbro@alfresco.com]
Sent: Montag, 7. Juni 2010 12:19
To: confluence-cmis@googlegroups.com
Cc: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenCMIS Release [was: OpenCMIS Sessions]
Hey guys,
great job, this is a perfect example of proper leveraging of the CMIS
API (and the OpenCMIS layer). Kudos Mau!
Cross-posting this to the chemistry-dev@ list, best place to discuss
whether we could proceed already with an alpha release.
@chemistry-devs: as I'm unsure when we're planning to do our first
"official" release, I was wondering if we could test-drive the process
by deploying an alpha release (non SNAPSHOT) on the apache releases
repo?
One additional reason would be preventing people building from trunk
and starting releasing their custom named/versioned versions on
corporate Maven repositories.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Gab
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Maurizio Pillitu wrote:
> Hi Florian,
> thanks a lot for your advises; we're already working on it; we'll
> notify you when the code is ready.
>
> One question: we're currently depending on
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-client-impl</artifactId>
> <version>0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
>
> Would be possible for you to release a non SNAPSHOT version? Even
> marking it as alpha or beta would be enough, so that our maven-based
> release process won't complain :-)
>
> Gabriele Columbro is in CC since I suspect he's involved in the
> OpenCMIS release phase.
>
> TIA
> mau
>
> On Jun 6, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Florian Müller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First of all, great work!
>>
>> I'm Florian and I'm an OpenCMIS committer. I had a look at your
>> source
>> code and I have a suggestion for improvement. You can increase the
>> performance (fewer calls to the repository) and lower the memory
>> footprint (shared cache) if you would not create a session for every
>> request. You could, for example, create and store a session object in
>> ConfluenceCMISRepository and reuse it. OpenCMIS session objects are
>> thread save and can handle parallel requests.
>>
>> - Florian
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "confluence-cmis" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to confluence-
>> cmis@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to confluence-cmis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/confluence-cmis?hl=en
>> .
>>
>
> --
> Maurizio Pillitu
> http://maurizio.pillitu.name
> maurizio@pillitu.name
>
--
Gabriele Columbro
Senior Solution Engineer, EMEA-APAC Professional Services
Alfresco Software, Ltd. (http://www.alfresco.com)
M: +31 (0)627 565 103
P: +39 320 161 28 46
D: +44 (0)1628 876 654
Skype: gabrielecolumbro
Blog: http://www.mindthegab.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mindthegabz
Tweet this: #Alfresco launches Activiti BPMN 2.0 business process
engine, hires JBoss jBPM architects Tom Baeyens & Joram Barrez http://bit.ly/ceeb3c