You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to nmaven-dev@incubator.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/02/18 20:37:29 UTC
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
> <organization>
> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
> </organization>
This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
Posted by Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>.
Okay, I'm going to switch back to the ASF for the organization.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 1:58 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think it's the latter... looking again at what Sebb said, I think
> what was already there was correct.
>
> On 19/02/2008, at 8:48 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
>
> > I believe that the template is correct: the license file should be
> > picking
> > up the pom.organization.name value. What I'm not sure is whether the
> > organization name should be Apache NMaven (the podling name) or The
> > Apache
> > Software Foundation.
> >
> > Shane
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2008 1:33 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
> >>
> >> On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
> >>
> >>> There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
> >>> the ${
> >>> pom.organization.name} value for the license.
> >>>
> >>> Shane
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> <organization>
> >>>>> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> >>>>> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> >>>>> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
> >>>>> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
> >>>>> </organization>
> >>>>
> >>>> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be
> >>>> inherited.
> >>>>
> >>>> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources
> >>>> should be
> >>>> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Brett Porter
> >>>> brett@apache.org
> >>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >> brett@apache.org
> >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
I think it's the latter... looking again at what Sebb said, I think
what was already there was correct.
On 19/02/2008, at 8:48 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
> I believe that the template is correct: the license file should be
> picking
> up the pom.organization.name value. What I'm not sure is whether the
> organization name should be Apache NMaven (the podling name) or The
> Apache
> Software Foundation.
>
> Shane
>
> On Feb 18, 2008 1:33 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
>>
>> On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
>>
>>> There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
>>> the ${
>>> pom.organization.name} value for the license.
>>>
>>> Shane
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <organization>
>>>>> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
>>>>> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
>>>>> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
>>>>> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
>>>>> </organization>
>>>>
>>>> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be
>>>> inherited.
>>>>
>>>> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources
>>>> should be
>>>> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
Posted by Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>.
I believe that the template is correct: the license file should be picking
up the pom.organization.name value. What I'm not sure is whether the
organization name should be Apache NMaven (the podling name) or The Apache
Software Foundation.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 1:33 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
>
> On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
>
> > There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
> > the ${
> > pom.organization.name} value for the license.
> >
> > Shane
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
> >>
> >>> <organization>
> >>> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> >>> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> >>> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
> >>> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
> >>> </organization>
> >>
> >> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
> >>
> >> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
> >> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brett Porter
> >> brett@apache.org
> >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
So is the template wrong, or was Sebb's suggestion incorrect?
On 19/02/2008, at 8:30 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
> There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up
> the ${
> pom.organization.name} value for the license.
>
> Shane
>
> On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> <organization>
>>> - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
>>> - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
>>> + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
>>> + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
>>> </organization>
>>
>> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
>>
>> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
>> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> brett@apache.org
>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: svn commit: r628859 - in /incubator/nmaven/trunk: NOTICE.txt pom.xml
Posted by Shane Isbell <sh...@gmail.com>.
There is not much we can do on this one because it is picking up the ${
pom.organization.name} value for the license.
Shane
On Feb 18, 2008 12:37 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2008, at 7:32 AM, sisbell@apache.org wrote:
>
> > <organization>
> > - <name>The Apache Software Foundation</name>
> > - <url>http://www.apache.org/</url>
> > + <name>Apache NMaven</name>
> > + <url>http://incubator.apache.org/nmaven</url>
> > </organization>
>
> This change seems incorrect - in fact this should just be inherited.
>
> If it's coming out wrong because of it, maybe the resources should be
> using ${pom.name} instead of ${pom.organization.name} somewhere?
>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>