You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by "Tilman Hausherr (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/16 22:28:05 UTC

[jira] [Created] (PDFBOX-2888) setAllSecurityToBeRemoved(true) before calling protect() should have no effect

Tilman Hausherr created PDFBOX-2888:
---------------------------------------

             Summary:  setAllSecurityToBeRemoved(true) before calling protect() should have no effect
                 Key: PDFBOX-2888
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2888
             Project: PDFBox
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Crypto
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
            Reporter: Tilman Hausherr
            Assignee: Tilman Hausherr
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: 2.0.0


As discussed on the mailing list:

user [~rnibali] had a problem where a file wasn't saved with encryption. The cause turned out to be that he had called
{code}
setAllSecurityToBeRemoved(true)
{code}

and then
{code}
protect(...)
{code}
Although the javadoc of both methods is clear, I see a risk that this happens again, e.g. when people combine existing code.

Solution: set allSecurityToBeRemoved to false when protect() is called and log a warning.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org