You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> on 2013/05/14 21:18:27 UTC
1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
The magic rev is r1482456
This is a release candidate, meaning if all goes well it (or something
very much like it) will become the final release. Please test this as
if it were the final release, understanding that there will be bugs in
any software we ship. <insert lecture about perfect being enemy of
the good here>
To all distributors and binary packagers: This isn't the final
release. It *won't* be the final release for a few weeks yet, so
please don't ship it as such. In any case, don't distribute any
releases based upon these tarballs until we complete our signature
gathering process and officially announce the release.
Reminder that the STATUS file is still for 1.8.0, please be careful
about moving changes to the approved section and only move changes
that appropriate to be merged at this point (i.e. changes that would not
restart our soak). If we have changes we want to put into 1.8.1, it's fine
to put them in the STATUS file and vote on them, just please do not move
them to the approved section. It may be helpful to refer to this section of
our documentation when determining what can done to the 1.8.x branch
during our soak period:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <da...@elego.de>.
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, May 14, 2013 at 23:19:36 -0400:
> Exceptions:
>
> ctypes-python: test_as_human_string (svntypes.SvnDateTestCase)
> test failed due to poorly written test (since fixed on trunk).
... and merged to 1.8.x for inclusion in rc3 (or 1.8.1).
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
On 05/14/2013 03:18 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
Summary:
+1 to release.
Platform:
Linux 3.2.0-39-generic-pae
Ubuntu 12.04.2 (precise) Linux (x86)
Python 2.7.3
Perl 5.14.2
Ruby 1.8.7
Java 1.6.0_27
Verification:
Exploded contents of tar.gz and tar.bz2 files were identical.
SHA1 checkums of tar.gz and tar.bz2 files matched published values.
Compiled successfully using pre-installed dependencies.
The following test sets completed successfully:
((svn, neon, serf, local) x (fsfs, bdb))
+ swig-py + ctypes-python + swig-rb + javahl
Exceptions:
ctypes-python: test_as_human_string (svntypes.SvnDateTestCase)
test failed due to poorly written test (since fixed on trunk).
Checksums:
9b8d319f6b556f856348a72563fd2d5005a6fa31 subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.gz
272a32237cf297f9cca5f511e600e46ac19ab052 subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.bz2
Signatures:
(See the appropriate distribution files.)
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Paul Burba <pt...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> The magic rev is r1482456
>
> This is a release candidate, meaning if all goes well it (or something
> very much like it) will become the final release. Please test this as
> if it were the final release, understanding that there will be bugs in
> any software we ship. <insert lecture about perfect being enemy of
> the good here>
SUMMARY:
---------
+1 to release
VERIFIED:
---------
Other than the expected differences in
subversion/include/svn_version.h,
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub and
tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip
is identical to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.8.x@1482456.
[1] See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0079.shtml) for details.
SHA1 checksum of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip
is bab03d90dc8cc27877372ba875009c5b878c9785
>gpg2 --verify subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made 05/14/13 15:11:59 Eastern Daylight Time using RSA
key ID 16A0DE01
gpg: Good signature from "Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <br...@apache.org>"
gpg: aka "Ben Reser <be...@wandisco.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 19BB CAEF 7B19 B280 A0E2 175E 62D4 8FAD 16A0 DE01
TESTED:
-------
[Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ ra_file | ra_svn | ra_serf) ]
Ruby bindings (Ruby test suite patched with the r1480344 group so I
can run the tests -- see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1482605 This
includes *no* changes to the bindings themselves, only the test
scripts)
JavaHL Bindings
RESULTS:
--------
All Tests Pass
PLATFORM:
---------
MS Windows 7 Home Premium Service Pack 1
Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Version 9.0.30729.1 SP
DEPENDENCIES:
-------------
APR: 1.4.6
APR-UTIL: 1.4.1
Neon: 0.29.5
zlib: 1.2.4
OpenSSL: 0.9.8q
Apache: 2.2.22
BDB: 4.8.30
sqlite: 3.7.7.1
Python: 2.7.2 (ActivePython 2.7.2.5)
Perl: 5.14.2
Ruby: ruby 1.8.7
java: 1.7.0_10
junit: 4.8.2
swig: 1.3.40
serf: 1.2.0
SIGNATURE:
----------
user: "Paul T. Burba <pb...@collab.net>"
4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)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=fJtS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> To all distributors and binary packagers: This isn't the final
> release. It *won't* be the final release for a few weeks yet, so
> please don't ship it as such. In any case, don't distribute any
> releases based upon these tarballs until we complete our signature
> gathering process and officially announce the release.
>
> Reminder that the STATUS file is still for 1.8.0, please be careful
> about moving changes to the approved section and only move changes
> that appropriate to be merged at this point (i.e. changes that would not
> restart our soak). If we have changes we want to put into 1.8.1, it's fine
> to put them in the STATUS file and vote on them, just please do not move
> them to the approved section. It may be helpful to refer to this section of
> our documentation when determining what can done to the 1.8.x branch
> during our soak period:
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization
--
Paul T. Burba
CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development
Skype: ptburba
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> It certainly counts as another +1 for Windows. Which means we reached
> quorum less than 24 hours after the tarballs were posted. Bit of a
> record there. :)
Can't say I agree with this. In my opinion one person can't vote for
Windows twice just by testing more than one variation of Windows.
There are two purposes to the voting:
1) To encourage multiple platforms get tested.
2) To ensure we have enough people in agreement to make sure it's a
legitimate release.
If you start counting the same person doing multiple tests as more
than one vote in the same column, then that dilutes at least the
second purpose. In fact you could argue a single person could do a
release by testing it on OS X, Linux, FreeBSD, Windows Vista,
Windows7, and Windows8 (or even worse just different Linux distros for
the 3 unix votes).
I have no issue with people voting for Unix and Windows, because their
vote only counts once for each count and a vote in each column does
not unbalance the vote.
I don't say this to discourage anyone from testing multiple platforms
or variations, the additional information is appreciated and helpful.
In this specific case I don't think there's any holdup since Mark's
provided his +1 and we have 3 votes for each.
> Not sure it makes sense to repeat the same signature twice in the .asc file.
Makes no sense at all, it'd be a duplicate signature.
Unless there are any immediate objections I'm starting the work to
announce 1.8.0-rc2.
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com>.
On 15.05.2013 18:02, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
>>> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
>>> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>>
>>> The magic rev is r1482456
>>>
>> Summary:
>> --------
>>
>> +1 to release.
>>
>> TESTED:
>> -------
>> [ fsfs ] x [ file | svn | http ]
>>
>> RESULTS:
>> --------
>> All Tests Pass
>>
>> PLATFORM:
>> ---------
>> MS Windows 7 Ultimate (x64)
>> Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Version 9.0.30729.1 SP
>>
>> DEPENDENCIES:
>> -------------
>> APR: 1.4.5
>> APR-Util: 1.4.1
>> Apache HTTPD: 2.2.22
>> zlib: 1.2.3
>> OpenSSL: 0.9.8y
>> Apache: 2.2.22
>> sqlite: 3.7.12.1
>> Python: 2.6.6
>> serf: 1.2.0
>>
>> Signatures:
>> -----------
>>
>> (See the appropriate distribution files.)
>>
> I'm also performed full check of 64-bit build on Windows with the same
> dependencies. I don't know will be this counted as another signature.
> But I can add my second signature to subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip.asc if
> needed.
It certainly counts as another +1 for Windows. Which means we reached
quorum less than 24 hours after the tarballs were posted. Bit of a
record there. :)
Not sure it makes sense to repeat the same signature twice in the .asc file.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
>> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
>> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>>
>> The magic rev is r1482456
>>
> Summary:
> --------
>
> +1 to release.
>
> TESTED:
> -------
> [ fsfs ] x [ file | svn | http ]
>
> RESULTS:
> --------
> All Tests Pass
>
> PLATFORM:
> ---------
> MS Windows 7 Ultimate (x64)
> Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Version 9.0.30729.1 SP
>
> DEPENDENCIES:
> -------------
> APR: 1.4.5
> APR-Util: 1.4.1
> Apache HTTPD: 2.2.22
> zlib: 1.2.3
> OpenSSL: 0.9.8y
> Apache: 2.2.22
> sqlite: 3.7.12.1
> Python: 2.6.6
> serf: 1.2.0
>
> Signatures:
> -----------
>
> (See the appropriate distribution files.)
>
I'm also performed full check of 64-bit build on Windows with the same
dependencies. I don't know will be this counted as another signature.
But I can add my second signature to subversion-1.8.0-rc2.zip.asc if
needed.
--
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> wrote:
> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> The magic rev is r1482456
>
Summary:
--------
+1 to release.
TESTED:
-------
[ fsfs ] x [ file | svn | http ]
RESULTS:
--------
All Tests Pass
PLATFORM:
---------
MS Windows 7 Ultimate (x64)
Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Version 9.0.30729.1 SP
DEPENDENCIES:
-------------
APR: 1.4.5
APR-Util: 1.4.1
Apache HTTPD: 2.2.22
zlib: 1.2.3
OpenSSL: 0.9.8y
Apache: 2.2.22
sqlite: 3.7.12.1
Python: 2.6.6
serf: 1.2.0
Signatures:
-----------
(See the appropriate distribution files.)
--
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:18:27PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0. You can
> fetch the proposed tarballs from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> The magic rev is r1482456
Summary: +1 to release
Tested: [bdb | fsfs] x [ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf]
swig bindings
javahl bindings
Test results: All passed.
Platform: OpenBSD 5.3 amd64
Dependencies:
bdb: 4.7.25
GNU-iconv: 1.14
apr: 1.4.6
apr-util: 1.4.1
httpd: 2.2.22
serf: 1.2.0
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.25
sqlite: 3071600
openssl: 1.0.1c
swig: 1.3.36
python: 2.7.3
perl: 5.12.2
ruby: 1.8.7-p358
java: 1.7.0_11
Signatures:
subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (OpenBSD)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJRk2S6AAoJEE99uqmaWblzYW4H/1cXo5DLnXd68Af6aV9rxMp6
9oTTcHYvDrlXiCSpFjt7v1aPBbWCiZo+N8UZeDrm+52pvgG5BGBnXZGEaVxiau77
J2h2qO7SEJgFwHwBQxoRcHVS8TalLu8904oofovpphWVJhXIGSNbZc4rlJ9TjNzj
yx7HwIyzKW1KDRfW72ALsHmSFIlEl70U+e+Xqy4FBIFAr11NT8ur+xnIC9mizT4V
9qy3pRAwgzSd9GgvuDqFyrjKZ9oDz97ZnahTicmQ3uJEiPQl+5wg5FMqldWB6r9C
zAORggaqG/n7NOGjbPFgfRtmpve96O0LeRN/DMqFnAo2CgZScxdHrbkLT0YLy1w=
=VTw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (OpenBSD)
iQEcBAABAgAGBQJRk2S+AAoJEE99uqmaWblzbbsH/3fy+OAnN1hmIq46n+0TRJ1K
Xy9WOyZFd5OP1VsWvU6/4LnnaKXHciQ8E69rO18LlIFmQF6AyWnR4/TsigxBKIG3
WZoFjpOgYocKx1QlmS6n/RS6MP1G5MGRJvs9UWUZsiO1Zb8Yg3E/PfkQ0SZF6bVX
o7cRsny7pckCfNAdWeO6hlyLDQlYNCNCgb43B0Ycop7Dmzh7CrvWU0TaI0UVqxeJ
yjwaDf3KBOdw1RXhHQIr50DGzcTVivMMuXJ7hYTWLOD11BK6RdKzqarA8/yMOuuR
T3Fgz+xrY8RVsoc+/k6FWbhTzQjnz0s343Z8JVgsS1Lr/WM76Pgju4cTF98RV4k=
=2477
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <da...@elego.de>.
Mark Phippard wrote on Tue, May 14, 2013 at 17:03:48 -0400:
> I am still getting those test failures in the svnrdump and svnsync
> tests. Given that the tests work for others, I would guess this is
> something odd about my machine setup. I manually did an svnsync to
> confirm the binary worked.
>
> In the svn:// and http:// tests I have a couple of additional failures
> I have not looked at yet that might be due to running the tests in
> parallel.
>
> Should I just sign the release and then leave it up to Ben if he wants
> to count my signature towards the Windows total, or just not sign it
> at all?
Signing the tarballs achieves two purposes:
1. It communicates to the community (including users) that you are +1 on
that tarball being GA quality.
2. It allows people who download a tarball to establish a chain of trust
back to a Subversion committer.
The former is sensitive to those "additional failures" you mention. The
latter isn't. That said, if you have signed the PGP keys of developers
who will sign the release, the marginal advantage to 'gpg --verify'iers
of your signature is minimal --- i.e., the latter goal isn't helped much.
Does that make sense?
Daniel
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
I am still getting those test failures in the svnrdump and svnsync
tests. Given that the tests work for others, I would guess this is
something odd about my machine setup. I manually did an svnsync to
confirm the binary worked.
In the svn:// and http:// tests I have a couple of additional failures
I have not looked at yet that might be due to running the tests in
parallel.
Should I just sign the release and then leave it up to Ben if he wants
to count my signature towards the Windows total, or just not sign it
at all?
Thanks
Mark
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/wheezy) 64-bit
Tested:
(local, svn, svn/sasl, serf, serf/v1) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb, ctypes-python
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS
Local dependencies:
apache2-threaded-dev : 2.2.22-13
libapr1-dev : 1.4.6-3
libaprutil1-dev : 1.4.1-3
libdb5.1-dev : 5.1.29-5
libsasl2-dev : 2.1.25.dfsg1-6
libsqlite3-dev : 3.7.16.2-1~bpo70+1
perl : 5.14.2-21
python2.7-dev : 2.7.3-6
ruby1.8-dev : 1.8.7.358-7
openjdk-7-jdk : 7u3-2.1.7-1
serf : 1.2.x@1731
subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.bz2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABCAAGBQJRk4J2AAoJEHbXiOHtGlmc/bIH/3wByeUIppd3vs08SJiXXn72
YIGqgZBmLHxQAGboQ3tGwhrDxFDJmNHocsPqjZuzZbl9T9hkqyR+A7AqtCQArpAR
FQei+MKrTa9VfmnNDKieM45R1HAVmYYIUlSCCSOP8rFoLn5PyKZPWKDQQk/0lSPF
e+JPryIxcTowJOSq3NpcLEC8JXZSkquRzB6UPWPEBkRjlse2PcYTGzQQCW0YnFL7
MtQZtMUUSw+nz9Fhy2TK3CMME3oaeuNsYWQ0NfvsWQQHUL7Z29GnMM4F68zeXfGC
yucYmGYWigjYUBgpPyJUv1jQ++vvgD8tpiBnK70VANJFYNpk+ex8rmKdtGdmKoU=
=bLBO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAABCAAGBQJRk4J2AAoJEHbXiOHtGlmcgckH/0ZlF/L6DR2y62w6pn0ShkII
YmmepqGaO9dZcXXL+SW3GTXTFPElH2k8fYW+IYx/9Slsxb9Pslgnn6wezfpY7bLk
K5PgDSaOGDXGu4QIkW5riv6mGyiUswwh2+AcM0EA3U3TePlCDLciq+RpctnJFnvA
fsM0jJxodalNK0Jy+3swk+aFRDG2S+PR1GeRZT+1tOzkBXVTaqGk40IlZ0UG4Fs5
GC8zEeMyut3HgTT3excSUeP5PEockMG9nwf+lcQAC3Ca/tXmDrE2k00V1nfeoZy2
bY+CQY1NAHlC8rulRzRaTeU41ZBwheKZ7+Nj2mjL3fATZlr7x9voCNByyBWj9mI=
=XMm8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just as a followup on my test failures.
>
> I got a chance to spin up a new VM and start over. Everything worked
> fine this time, so the failures must be something specific to my
> laptop where I normally run the tests..
Thanks Mark.
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signature committed.
>
> SUMMARY:
> +1 to release
>
> PLATFORM:
> Windows 7
> VS 2012 Update 2
> Java 1.6
>
> COMPONENTS:
> Apache 2.4.4
> APR 1.4.6
> APR-UTIL 1.5.1
> OpenSSL 1.0.1e
> Serf 1.2.0
> ZLib 1.2.8
> SQLite 3.7.16.2
>
> VERIFIED:
> signature and sha1
>
> TESTED:
> JavaHL
> ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf X fsfs
>
> RESULTS:
> All passed except svnsync + svnrdump as noted on dev@.
Just as a followup on my test failures.
I got a chance to spin up a new VM and start over. Everything worked
fine this time, so the failures must be something specific to my
laptop where I normally run the tests..
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
Signature committed.
SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows 7
VS 2012 Update 2
Java 1.6
COMPONENTS:
Apache 2.4.4
APR 1.4.6
APR-UTIL 1.5.1
OpenSSL 1.0.1e
Serf 1.2.0
ZLib 1.2.8
SQLite 3.7.16.2
VERIFIED:
signature and sha1
TESTED:
JavaHL
ra_local | ra_svn | ra_serf X fsfs
RESULTS:
All passed except svnsync + svnrdump as noted on dev@.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com> writes:
> The build fails when configured with --enable-runtime-module-search due
> to a new explict dependency of libsvn_fs on libsvn_delta (a dependency
> that is satisfied by libsvn_fs_fs/libsvn_fs_base when built without
> --enable-runtime-module-search).
>
> A workaround is to use --disable-disallowing-of-undefined-references
> which allows the build to complete. The binary libraries will be
> suitable for most users, the only people who will have a problem are
> those that link to libsvn_fs without linking to libsvn_delta. A better
> workaround is the one-line change to build.conf in r1482724.
>
> r1482724 is proposed for 1.8. I think the workarounds are sufficient
> and so this does not need to be fixed for 1.8.0.
The workarounds are sufficient for the release candidate tarball, but it
would be good to fix this for the final 1.8.0 release. While using
--disable-disallowing-of-undefined-references allows the build to work
it is not as good as getting the dependencies right. Getting the
dependencies right involves not only the small change to build.conf but
also running gen-make.py, and that means having Python, or editing
build-outputs.mk.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@wandisco.com>.
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org> writes:
> Here it is: the second Release Candidate for Subversion 1.8.0.
The build fails when configured with --enable-runtime-module-search due
to a new explict dependency of libsvn_fs on libsvn_delta (a dependency
that is satisfied by libsvn_fs_fs/libsvn_fs_base when built without
--enable-runtime-module-search).
A workaround is to use --disable-disallowing-of-undefined-references
which allows the build to complete. The binary libraries will be
suitable for most users, the only people who will have a problem are
those that link to libsvn_fs without linking to libsvn_delta. A better
workaround is the one-line change to build.conf in r1482724.
r1482724 is proposed for 1.8. I think the workarounds are sufficient
and so this does not need to be fixed for 1.8.0.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Re: 1.8.0-rc2 up for testing/signing
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com>.
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform
Mac OS X 10.8.3 Mountain Lion, build 12D78
Standard dependencies:
Apple clang(++) 4.2/LLVM 3.2svn
APR 1.4.5
APR-Util 1.3.12
zlib 1.2.5
httpd 2.2.22
OpenSSL 0.9.8r
Java 1.6.0_45
Python 2.7.2
Perl 5.12.4
Dependencies from homebrew:
SQLite 3.7.16.2
Serf 1.2.0
BDB 5.3.21
Swig 2.0.9
libmagic 5.13
Other dependencies:
JUnit 4.10
ctypesgen svn-r147
Verified:
Tarball contents and signatures
(fsfs, bdb) x (local, svnserve, dav)
check-all-javahl
check-swig-py
check-swig-rb
check-swig-pl
Issues:
- 'make check-ctypes-python' fails:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test/run_all.py", line 22, in <module>
import setup_path
File "/Users/brane/src/svn/repos/1.8.x/subversion/bindings/ctypes-python/test/setup_path.py", line 31, in <module>
import csvn.core
File "/Users/brane/src/svn/repos/1.8.x/subversion/bindings/ctypes-python/csvn/core/__init__.py", line 134, in <module>
f.argtypes = [POINTER(POINTER(svn_auth_provider_object_t)), POINTER(apr_pool_t)]
NameError: name 'svn_auth_provider_object_t' is not defined
- Swig bindings do not build with the generated wrappers included in
the tarball. Running autogen, configure and 'make clean'
regenerates them and the bindings then build succesfully.
- 'make check-javahl' requires 'make install'
- 'make check-swig-rb' requires 'make install-swig-rb'
- Lots of new warnings in the optimized build due to behaviour of
the newer clang (fix proposed for backport to 1.8.1)
GPG Signatures:
$ cat subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.gz.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
iQEcBAABCgAGBQJRk01iAAoJECm4ktDIYoUB328H/05yxEQFeXCWtZA1bzyFroa0
Vrrnkw6f+pxD/klUEulDrpcL0Yo0kKp39fbAabXahSRIAVOG4by4x9irzdEQBkO4
jSPX2MNqdzN8kLrwGjwDzjoF1dps/CiZIzlwcBfb99UygV8cDMAvdoGvNiMPAIrM
cXFGLbKvIJLbo3vg6PGlg52zJq2iVPSAbfmWcr5tiV1YgQ2tOBNiQfEyOk+sdRyg
osC46sWMKzQepJYZHhb4ZalUwLm4UyqhIbkzy6uRPSecXI2ewm1WPqU1Ic+QVMe/
9MTXDUZWsivni5Wc1h7p/XSWRCenwnagEb0FXAFs/Gauqie1zmsiHqxMS/VS/GY=
=vgxM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
$ cat subversion-1.8.0-rc2.tar.bz2.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
iQEcBAABCgAGBQJRk01cAAoJECm4ktDIYoUB64YH/ijlgamHu8/zcFN8yJ7HCv2y
fxndczTpvsNyOF9tUuKlULcgoPGp2RCkNBoQ95aHLWVyH8xCKJ5Colo1Xy7rI7Jo
sc1bDdrWjYPnl4J3ZCToSifURmY3z+nMjMFlAeKPj0ieA6+P3ASlhKRon7Ls4siq
jsqhizjAyOnVXZh6BER6jkeuGL/JmSImzD+KYLAiSUly79eUt4R2JeArwmzMgiX/
+a3tOG2+ebno6HgzmqKrpWJyDCTUeVcSYfgjtaCQAv9MvScJxbaYjZF1zO8mvLGJ
fm7UaHP9vV4hjDu+TCtTuQ06REJHQqYbrM80xcoe2lL5Cjn2aFFTnv0bDGZ2AjY=
=kWMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com