You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> on 2019/11/12 12:29:31 UTC
modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla?
It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are
essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or
"worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites
argumentation.
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Posted by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 2:01 PM Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla?
> >>>
> >>> It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are
> >>> essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or
> >>> "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites
> >>> argumentation.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ?
> >
> > That helps, or even "CLOSED"
> >
>
> Added both for good measure :)
I quite like Eric's subliminal s/worksforme/worksforsome/ too, if as easy :)
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla?
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are
>>> essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or
>>> "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites
>>> argumentation.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ?
>
> That helps, or even "CLOSED"
>
Added both for good measure :)
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote:
> > Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla?
> >
> > It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are
> > essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or
> > "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites
> > argumentation.
> >
>
> Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ?
That helps, or even "CLOSED"
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote:
> Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla?
>
> It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are
> essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or
> "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites
> argumentation.
>
Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ?