Re: [patch] have_apache_mpm()

[Cliff Woolley <jw...@virginia.edu>]

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:

> plan ..., have_apache2 && have_apache_mpm('prefork');

I think this is probably the way to go.  If you call have_apache_mpm() and
it's apache 1.3, I might have it return an error of some kind, but I
wouldn't have it return 'prefork'.

--Cliff

Re: [patch] have_apache_mpm()

[Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>]

gyoung@modperlcookbook.org wrote:
>>On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>plan ..., have_apache2 && have_apache_mpm('prefork');
>>
>>I think this is probably the way to go.  If you call have_apache_mpm()
>>and it's apache 1.3, I might have it return an error of some kind, but
>>I wouldn't have it return 'prefork'.
> 
> 
> ok, I can do that.
> 
> so, have_apache_mpm() will return false for Apache 1.3 and the mpm for
> Apache 2.I'll add some docs too.

+1

> I don't have the code in front of me, but if have_apache2 isn't there I'll
> implement thatas well.

We have that one already: have_apache(2)

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Re: [patch] have_apache_mpm()

[gy...@modperlcookbook.org]

> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> plan ..., have_apache2 && have_apache_mpm('prefork');
>
> I think this is probably the way to go.  If you call have_apache_mpm()
> and it's apache 1.3, I might have it return an error of some kind, but
> I wouldn't have it return 'prefork'.

ok, I can do that.

so, have_apache_mpm() will return false for Apache 1.3 and the mpm for
Apache 2.I'll add some docs too.

I don't have the code in front of me, but if have_apache2 isn't there I'll
implement thatas well.

thanks for the feedback

--Geoff

Re: [patch] have_apache_mpm()

[Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>]

Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> 
>>plan ..., have_apache2 && have_apache_mpm('prefork');
> 
> 
> I think this is probably the way to go.  If you call have_apache_mpm() and
> it's apache 1.3, I might have it return an error of some kind, but I
> wouldn't have it return 'prefork'.

ok, that's what I'll do then.

I'll code have_apache_mpm() so it returns false for Apache 1.3 and the 
mpm for Apache 2.  I also have some brief docs ready to go, so I'll 
add that into the next iteration as well.

I don't have the code in front of me, we probably don't need 
have_apache2() if it doesn't already exist - have_apache_version() and 
variants are probably sufficient I would think.

--Geoff