You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> on 2009/09/21 22:49:45 UTC
Re: [Bug 5881] dependency checker should understand the Mail::SPF
/ Mail::SPF:: Query scenario
On 04/11/2008 09:02 PM, bugzilla-daemon@issues.apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea<sp...@dostech.ca> 2008-04-11 18:02:51 PST ---
> Actually, come to think of it, it might be an opportune time to drop support
> for Mail::SPF::Query too. It has been obsoleted for 2+ years now.
>
>
I just noticed that my RHEL-5 is running spamassassin-3.3.0 is still
using Mail::SPF::Query. We don't have Mail::SPF packaged in that repo
yet although I can add it.
What kind of behaviorial difference is there to spamassassin using
Mail::SPF::Query instead of Mail::SPF?
http://search.cpan.org/~jmehnle/Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1/
http://search.cpan.org/~jmehnle/Mail-SPF-v2.006/
Does anyone know the history of these two modules? Is there any reason
to keep Mail::SPF::Query anymore? It seems the only package in Fedora
that requires the latter is spampd.
Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com
Re: [Bug 5881] dependency checker should understand the Mail::SPF / Mail::SPF:: Query scenario
Posted by Michael Peddemors <mi...@linuxmagic.com>.
Quick question..
Just doing a quick test on the latest svn release, on Debian squeeze/sid and
ran into:
cp sa-learn blib/script/sa-learn
/usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::MY" -e "MY->fixin(shift)" blib/script/sa-learn
make: *** No rule to make target `sa-awl.raw', needed by `sa-awl'. Stop.
I guess I should post on the bug list, but quick search showed no bugs
referencing sa-awl.raw, so maybe this is a common issue.
On September 21, 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
> On 04/11/2008 09:02 PM, bugzilla-daemon@issues.apache.org wrote:
> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Daryl C. W. O'Shea<sp...@dostech.ca>
> > 2008-04-11 18:02:51 PST --- Actually, come to think of it, it might be an
> > opportune time to drop support for Mail::SPF::Query too. It has been
> > obsoleted for 2+ years now.
>
> I just noticed that my RHEL-5 is running spamassassin-3.3.0 is still
> using Mail::SPF::Query. We don't have Mail::SPF packaged in that repo
> yet although I can add it.
>
> What kind of behaviorial difference is there to spamassassin using
> Mail::SPF::Query instead of Mail::SPF?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~jmehnle/Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1/
> http://search.cpan.org/~jmehnle/Mail-SPF-v2.006/
>
> Does anyone know the history of these two modules? Is there any reason
> to keep Mail::SPF::Query anymore? It seems the only package in Fedora
> that requires the latter is spampd.
>
> Warren Togami
> wtogami@redhat.com
>
--
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Peddemors - President/CEO - LinuxMagic
Products, Services, Support and Development
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" is a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
604-589-0037 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.