You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Peter Cseh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/14 14:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OOZIE-2814) OYA: Update example workflows
to newest schemas
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16364174#comment-16364174 ]
Peter Cseh edited comment on OOZIE-2814 at 2/14/18 2:51 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
The patch looks good overall.
Have you tried running the old examples after the code changes to check on backwards compatibility?
was (Author: gezapeti):
The patch looks good overall.
Have you tried running the old examples after the code changes to check on backwards compatibility?https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16363929#
> OYA: Update example workflows to newest schemas
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2814
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0
> Reporter: Robert Kanter
> Assignee: Attila Sasvari
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: OOZIE-2814-00.patch, OOZIE-2814-01.patch, OOZIE-2814-02.patch, OOZIE-2814-03.patch, OOZIE-2814-04.patch, OOZIE-2814-05.patch, OOZIE-2814-06.patch
>
>
> OOZIE-2687 will add in a whole set of newer schemas that are more Yarn-centric. Most, if not all, examples currently use pretty old versions of the schemas. We should take this opportunity to update the examples to the newest schemas added by OOZIE-2687, which should help demonstrate them.
> It may make sense to keep the older schemas too, to show that older workflows still work. We have some examples where we have two workflow XML files that do the same thing in different ways.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)